Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
Why should Keralas children die this way?
access_time 24 Dec 2025 10:20 AM IST
An entirely irrational hike in train fares
access_time 23 Dec 2025 9:35 AM IST
Let Kerala follow Karnatakas example
access_time 22 Dec 2025 9:45 AM IST
Hang your head low over this crime most foul
access_time 20 Dec 2025 9:30 AM IST
Hat-trick from 70 years ago
access_time 19 Dec 2025 4:19 PM IST
Treatment needed for doping on field
access_time 19 Dec 2025 9:30 AM IST
DEEP READ
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 11:16 AM IST
Espionage in the UK
access_time 13 Jun 2025 10:20 PM IST
Yet another air tragedy
access_time 13 Jun 2025 9:45 AM IST
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightFSI refutes media...

FSI refutes media reports on Aravalli protection, says no study found 90% of hills at risk

text_fields
bookmark_border
FSI refutes media reports on Aravalli protection, says no study found 90% of hills at risk
cancel

The Forest Survey of India (FSI) on Tuesday said it had not conducted any study claiming that 90% of the Aravalli hills would be left unprotected following a recent Supreme Court judgment, while firmly rejecting media reports that attributed such findings to the organisation.

In a clarification issued through posts on X, the FSI stated that it had neither assessed the post-judgment protection status of the Aravallis nor concluded that only 9% of the hill range lay above the 100-metre threshold, which has become central to the current debate on protection norms.

The statement came amid widespread discussion triggered by reports linking the Supreme Court’s November 20, 2025, judgment to a potential dilution of safeguards for large parts of the ancient hill system.

An Indian Express report published on November 27 had cited internal FSI documents indicating that only 1,048 of the 12,081 Aravalli hill features in Rajasthan that are 20 metres or higher exceed 100 metres in height, suggesting that barely 8.7% of the range in the state would qualify for protection under that definition, even as Rajasthan accounts for the largest share of the Aravallis across India.

The report had also referred to concerns within the Union Environment Ministry that such a cut-off could leave lower hill formations vulnerable, thereby increasing the risk of desertification, dust movement from the Thar Desert and adverse impacts on agriculture and public health in the Indo-Gangetic plains, including Delhi-NCR.

Long-standing environmental damage to the Aravallis has been documented earlier, as a report submitted by the Central Empowered Committee to the Supreme Court noted that mining activities had led to the disappearance of 31 out of 128 hills in Rajasthan, while rapid urbanisation and extraction of minerals had severely depleted forest cover over decades.

The FSI clarification followed a statement by the Union Environment Ministry a day earlier that only 217.89 square kilometres out of the total 1.43 lakh square kilometres Aravalli region was currently open for mining, even as concerns over conservation and enforcement continue to intensify.

Show Full Article
TAGS:Aravalli hillsForest Survey of India
Next Story