Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
election commmission
access_time 22 Nov 2024 4:02 AM GMT
Champions Trophy tournament
access_time 21 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The illness in health care
access_time 20 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The fire in Manipur should be put out
access_time 21 Nov 2024 9:19 AM GMT
America should also be isolated
access_time 18 Nov 2024 11:57 AM GMT
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
DEEP READ
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Foreign espionage in the UK
access_time 22 Oct 2024 8:38 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightBilkis Bano case: SC...

Bilkis Bano case: SC to hear arguments on pleas against premature release of convicts on Oct 9

text_fields
bookmark_border
Bilkis Bano case: SC to hear arguments on pleas against premature release of convicts on Oct 9
cancel

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday said that it will hear on Monday, October 9, the arguments on petitions challenging the premature release of 11 convicts in the Bilkis Bano gangrape case murder of seven of her family members during the 2002 Gujarat riots.

“List on October 9 at 2 pm. In the meanwhile, counsel for the petitioners to file their short-written arguments,” a bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan said.

One of the advocates appearing in the matter said arguments on behalf of the convicts have been concluded and now the matter has been fixed for hearing rejoinder submissions by the petitioners’ counsel.

However, the bench told the lawyer, “We don’t want re-opening of the whole case again at your instance,” adding, it would be better if the petitioners' counsel file a short note of their rejoinder arguments.

While hearing the matter on September 20, the top court had asked whether convicts have a fundamental right to seek remission.

“Is the right to seek remission a fundamental right? Will a petition lie under Article 32 (that deals with citizens’ right to move apex court directly if their fundamental rights are infringed) of the Constitution,” the bench had asked a lawyer appearing for one of the 11 convicts.

The lawyer had acknowledged seeking remission was indeed not a fundamental right of the convicts.

The victim and others also do not have the right to move the apex court directly by filing a petition under Article 32 as no fundamental right of theirs has been infringed either, he had argued, adding the victims have other statutory rights to challenge the grant of remission.

While hearing the arguments on August 17, the top court had said state governments should not be selective in granting remission to convicts and the opportunity to reform and reintegrate with society should extend to every prisoner.

Besides the petition filed by Bilkis Bano contesting the remission granted to them, several other PILs including one by CPI(M) leader Subhashini Ali, independent journalist Revati Laul, and former vice-chancellor of Lucknow University Roop Rekha Verma have challenged the relief. TMC MP Mahua Moitra has also filed a PIL against the remission and their premature release.

Bilkis Bano was 21 years old and five months pregnant when she was gang-raped while fleeing the horror of the communal riots that broke out after the Godhra train-burning incident. Her three-year-old daughter was among the seven family members killed in the riots.

With inputs from PTI

Show Full Article
TAGS:Supreme CourtBilkis Bano caseGujarat riot 2002India News
Next Story