Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
Champions Trophy tournament
access_time 21 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The illness in health care
access_time 20 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The fire in Manipur should be put out
access_time 21 Nov 2024 9:19 AM GMT
America should also be isolated
access_time 18 Nov 2024 11:57 AM GMT
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
The betrayal of the highest order
access_time 16 Nov 2024 12:22 PM GMT
DEEP READ
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Foreign espionage in the UK
access_time 22 Oct 2024 8:38 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightNewsClick case: Delhi...

NewsClick case: Delhi Court allows Purkayastha, HR head's applications for FIR copy

text_fields
bookmark_border
NewsClick case: Delhi Court allows Purkayastha, HR heads applications for FIR copy
cancel

New Delhi: Prabir Purkayastha, the founder of NewsClick, and Amit Chakravarty, the head of human resources, were both arrested in a case filed under the anti-terror law UAPA on suspicion that the news portal had accepted funding to propagate pro-China propaganda. On Thursday, a Delhi court allowed their application for a copy of the FIR. Judge Hardeep Kaur of the Additional Sessions ordered the municipal police to give the two a copy of the FIR. A detailed order is awaited.

During the proceedings, the counsel for Chakravarty also sought in writing the grounds for his arrest, asserting that it was a constitutional safeguard for the accused.

The advocate cited some judgments of the Supreme Court and the Delhi High Court to claim that though the offences alleged against his client under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) were “serious”, there were no statutory grounds for the prosecution to deny him a copy of the FIR.

Purkayastha's advocate, appearing through video-conferencing, argued it was the accused's right to get a copy of the FIR.

Special Public Prosecutor Atul Shrivastava opposed the applications. He cited a Supreme Court judgment to say an accused has to first approach the police commissioner, who would then form a committee to consider the request.

He said the accused have to follow the “step-by-step procedure” prescribed by the apex court. The application filed by the accused was “premature” and they cannot “directly jump before the court”, Shrivastava added.

“We have already provided the grounds for arrest and the reasons for further remand. We have already complied with the provisions,” he said.

Citing the remand paper, the SPP said the accused undermined the unity and territorial integrity of the country, besides engaging in a discussion regarding a map of India without Kashmir and showing Arunachal Pradesh as a disputed area. They received Rs 115 crore in the guise of foreign funding, he said.

“We had duly informed this court (the grounds for arrest) when we sought police custody and the accused were allowed to talk to their family members and advocate,” he said.

Purkayastha and Chakravarty were arrested by the Special Cell of the Delhi Police on Tuesday. Police have sealed NewsClick’s office in Delhi.


With PTI inputs

Show Full Article
TAGS:delhi courtUAPANewsClickIndia News
Next Story