Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
The illness in health care
access_time 20 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
Manipurs flames must be quelled
access_time 19 Nov 2024 11:52 AM GMT
America should also be isolated
access_time 18 Nov 2024 11:57 AM GMT
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
The betrayal of the highest order
access_time 16 Nov 2024 12:22 PM GMT
DEEP READ
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Foreign espionage in the UK
access_time 22 Oct 2024 8:38 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightYogi Adityanath...

Yogi Adityanath inflammatory speech case: SC upholds UP court's decision

text_fields
bookmark_border
Yogi Adityanath inflammatory speech case: SC upholds UP courts decision
cancel

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has dismissed a plea challenging the Allahabad High Court judgment over Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath's inflammatory speech in 2007. Two months after he became CM in 2017, the state government informed the High Court that it is refusing sanction for prosecuting Adityanath and others booked in the case.

The High Court was approached by Parvez Parvaz and Asad Hayat challenging the government's refusal of sanction. The petition requested that the problem be handed over to an independent agency like the CBI. It also alleged that the state police's CB-CID was deliberately delaying and impeding the investigation.

In 2019, the High Court dismissed the plea saying it found no procedural error in the probe and the refusal of sanction. The bench stated that it found no illegality in the order which may require any interference by the court.

Parvaz approached the Supreme Court suggesting whether Yogi Adityanath, as the Chief Minister, could have participated in the process of granting sanction in a case that involved him. The SC bench has now upheld the HC's verdict on the matter.

The top court on Friday left open a legal question about the denial of sanction in the appropriate case, reported The Indian Express.

The inflammatory speech in question took place in 2007 in Gorakhpur when Yogi Adityanath was MP. Parvaz, a former journalist, alleged that the speech delivered by Adityanath seeking revenge for the death of a Hindu youth led to the clash between two groups during a Muharram procession on January 27, 2007. He filed the case on September 26, 2008.

In 2015, the police sought sanction for prosecution from the Samajwadi Party government. The state government led by BJP in May 2017 filed its affidavit which said the main evidence presented had been tampered with.

The Yogi Adityanath government argued that the Central Forensic Science Laboratory found that the submitted videos of the speech had been edited. The voice samples were not taken directly from Adityanath but other speeches delivered by him.

Parvaz is currently in jail serving life imprisonment in a 2018 gang rape case. A 40-year-old person accused him and another person of assaulting her.

Show Full Article
TAGS:Supreme CourtUP governmentYogi Adityanathinflammatory speech case
Next Story