Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
The helplessness of the UN
access_time 30 Sep 2024 9:23 AM GMT
The power groups in politics
access_time 28 Sep 2024 4:07 AM GMT
Is India a hostile place for women?
access_time 27 Sep 2024 12:21 PM GMT
Another comforting verdict for press freedom
access_time 26 Sep 2024 1:13 PM GMT
This verdict is for our children
access_time 25 Sep 2024 4:56 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightVerdict on pleas...

Verdict on pleas against demolition of properties reserved by SC

text_fields
bookmark_border
Verdict on pleas against demolition of properties reserved by SC
cancel

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday said it will lay down guidelines for all people on the matter of demolition of buildings and reserved its ruling on pleas which have contended that properties, including those of those accused of crime, were being demolished in different states.

Observing that its directions will be applicable to pan-India, the apex court said it will make it clear that merely because a person is an accused or even a convict, it can't be grounds for demolition of the property.

"Whatever we are laying down, we are a secular country. We are laying it down for all the citizens, for all the institutions not for any particular community," a bench of Justices B R Gavai and K V Viswanathan said.

Observing that there can't be a different law for a particular religion, the bench said it will not protect any unauthorised constructions on public roads, government lands or forests.

"We will take care to ensure that our order does not help the encroachers on any of the public places," the bench said.

"Close for orders," the bench said after the hearing in the matter concluded.

After the bench said it was reserving its verdict in the matter, one of the advocates appearing for the petitioners referred to the apex court's order of September 17 which had said there would be no demolition of properties, including of those accused of crime, till October 1 without its permission.

The lawyer urged the bench to extend its interim order.

"It is there till we decide this matter," the bench said.

Earlier the court had observed that even one instance of illegal demolition was against the "ethos" of the Constitution.

The apex court had clarified that its order would not be applicable if there was an unauthorised structure in any public place such as roads, streets, footpaths, abutting railway lines or any water bodies and also to cases where there was an order for demolition made by a court of law.

Show Full Article
TAGS:Supreme Courtdemolition
Next Story