Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightNot communal but an...

Not communal but an old feud: accused family claims Tarun was mistakenly hit by his brother

text_fields
bookmark_border
Not communal but an old feud: accused family claims Tarun was mistakenly hit by his brother
cancel

The killing of 26-year-old Tarun Kumar in Delhi’s Uttam Nagar on March 4, following a neighbourhood altercation triggered by water balloons thrown during Holi, has drawn national attention, even as members of the accused household insist that Tarun’s death was not caused by them but occurred amid the chaotic clash between the two neighbouring families.

What ostensibly began as a trivial altercation over the stray splashes of a water balloon during the Holi festivities soon metastasised into a harrowing saga of bereavement and judicial retribution.

Despite the burgeoning communal undertones threatening to destabilise the precinct, the genesis of this catastrophe appears rooted in a protracted, decades-old domestic friction between two Rajasthan-originated families rather than a spontaneous sectarian eruption.

The incident unfolded in JJ Colony, where Tarun Kumar’s family and the household of the accused had lived in proximity for years, and while the clash has since acquired a communal overhang in public discourse, both sides have narrated sharply divergent accounts of the confrontation that escalated into deadly violence.

Shaheen, the 20-year-old member of the accused’s family, categorically repudiated the allegation of murder levelled against her kin. She rejected the claim that her relatives killed Tarun Kumar and instead asserted that the fatal blow may have been inflicted inadvertently by members of Tarun’s own family, who were allegedly in an inebriated state during the melee that erupted outside the houses, according to a report by The Wire.

In a detailed account of the events preceding the violence, she maintained that the initial provocation was far removed from the portrayal of an innocent childhood prank, contending instead that a grown man, and not a minor girl, deliberately doused her paternal aunt with contaminated water while the latter was returning after procuring supplies for Sehri.

Shaheen asserted that the individual responsible for throwing the balloons was not a young child, as claimed by Tarun’s family, but an adult man in his twenties, and she dismissed the suggestion that the episode was an accidental act committed by a minor.

She further claimed that when her aunt protested against the act, four men from Tarun’s household, whom she described as intoxicated, emerged from the house and allegedly behaved inappropriately with the woman while hurling abusive remarks; the confrontation intensified when her brother stepped outside upon hearing the commotion and was allegedly assaulted.

According to her narration, elders from both families attempted to intervene in order to defuse the tension and initiate a conciliatory settlement, yet the situation deteriorated when Tarun Kumar allegedly arrived at the scene accompanied by a phalanx of intoxicated associates whom she claims were armed with iron rods, hockey sticks and other improvised weapons.

Amid the ensuing violence, she alleged, members of Tarun’s group attacked several individuals from her household, and in the confusion that followed, Tarun’s brother Arun — allegedly inebriated — mistakenly struck Tarun himself on the back of the head, causing him to collapse.

Police records indicate that eight individuals from both sides sustained injuries during the confrontation, and Tarun Kumar was later taken to the hospital, where he succumbed to his injuries on March 5.

The police have confirmed that 14 individuals, including three women, have been arrested in connection with the case, while two minors have been detained, and the investigation is continuing on the basis of CCTV footage and witness testimonies.

Meanwhile, Tarun Kumar’s uncle has publicly distanced the family from attempts to frame the incident in communal terms, stating that the bereaved household had no role in the vandalism that later occurred at the accused family’s residence.

Show Full Article
Next Story