No bail for Wangchuk on health grounds; is fit, 'hale and hearty': SC
text_fields
New Delhi: Sonam Wangchuk, a social activist from Ladakh who is being held in preventive detention under the National Security Act (NSA), is "fit, hale and hearty" and cannot be released on medical grounds, the Centre told the Supreme Court on Wednesday.
Solicitor General (SG) Tushar Mehta, representing the Union government, told a bench of Justices Aravind Kumar and Prasanna B. Varale that Wangchuk's health has been monitored on a regular basis and that there is "nothing alarming" that would justify his release.
Opposing any relaxation on medical grounds, SG Mehta told the apex court: “It will not be possible to release him on health grounds. It may not be desirable, either. We have given utmost consideration.”
“We have examined his health periodically 24 times. He is fit, hale and hearty. He had some digestive issues; he is being treated. There is nothing to worry about, nothing alarming. We cannot make exceptions like this,” added the Centre’s second-highest law officer.
The submissions were made during the hearing of a habeas corpus petition filed by Dr Gitanjali J. Angmo, challenging her husband’s detention under the NSA as “illegal” and an “arbitrary exercise violating his fundamental rights”, IANS reported.
In an earlier hearing, the Supreme Court had orally asked the Union government to reconsider the continued preventive detention of Wangchuk, particularly in view of his “not very good” health and advancing age.
The Justice Kumar-led Bench had observed that Wangchuk has been in custody since September 26, 2025, and suggested that the government “give it a thought” on whether his detention needed to continue.
Earlier this week, the top court had cautioned against granting further adjournments in the matter and had declined a request for more time from the government’s law officer. Directed that the matter be listed for hearing at 2 p.m. on Wednesday, it had told Additional Solicitor General (ASG) K.M. Nataraj: “You must understand it is a habeas corpus matter”.
