Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
Liquor, liquor everywhere!
access_time 25 May 2024 6:03 AM GMT
More support for an independent Palestine
access_time 24 May 2024 12:02 PM GMT
When toxins flow through Periyar once again
access_time 23 May 2024 5:34 AM GMT
Eight years balance sheet of LDF government
access_time 22 May 2024 4:58 AM GMT
Ebrahim Raisi
access_time 21 May 2024 5:20 AM GMT
Chabahar Port
access_time 20 May 2024 4:00 AM GMT
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_right‘I made a mistake’:...

‘I made a mistake’: Arvind Kejriwal tells the Supreme Court

‘I made a mistake’: Arvind Kejriwal tells the Supreme Court

New Delhi: Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal on Monday told the Supreme Court he made a mistake by retweeting an allegedly defamatory video related to the BJP IT Cell, which was circulated by YouTuber Dhruv Rathee.

A bench of justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta, without issuing notice on a plea of Mr Kejriwal challenging a Delhi High Court order which upheld summons issued to him as an accused in the criminal defamation case, asked the complainant whether he wanted to close the matter in view of the chief minister's apology.

The bench also asked the trial court not to take up the defamation case involving Mr Kejriwal till March 11.

Senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi, appearing for Mr Kejriwal, said, "I can say this much that I made a mistake by retweeting." In its judgment dated February 5, the high court had said that reposting alleged libellous content would attract the defamation law.

The high court had said a sense of responsibility has to be attached while retweeting content about which one does not have knowledge and added that retweeting of defamatory content must invite penal, civil as well as tort action if the person retweeting it does not attach a disclaimer.

The chief minister had said in the high court that the trial court failed to appreciate that his tweet was not intended or likely to harm the complainant, Vikas Sankrityayan.

Mr Kejriwal's plea before the high court said the trial court erred in not providing any reasons for issuing the summons and the orders were 'ex-facie' devoid of judicial application of mind.

Mr Sankrityayan claimed the YouTube video titled 'BJP IT Cell Part II' was circulated by Rathee, who lives in Germany, "wherein a number of false and defamatory allegations were made".

PTI with edits

Show Full Article
TAGS:New DelhiIndia News
Next Story