Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
The verdict of discernment
access_time 9 Dec 2025 10:00 AM IST
Isnt expelling citizens punishable?
access_time 8 Dec 2025 9:30 AM IST
Extreme weather and frenzied politics
access_time 6 Dec 2025 9:30 AM IST
Moral politics and morality of politicians
access_time 5 Dec 2025 9:30 AM IST
Trump, Zelensky
access_time 4 Dec 2025 11:08 AM IST
DEEP READ
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 11:16 AM IST
Espionage in the UK
access_time 13 Jun 2025 10:20 PM IST
Yet another air tragedy
access_time 13 Jun 2025 9:45 AM IST
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightPIL in SC against...

PIL in SC against govt's move to intercept, monitor any computer

text_fields
bookmark_border
PIL in SC against govts move to intercept, monitor any computer
cancel

New Delhi: A PIL was filed on Monday in the Supreme Court challenging the government's notification authorising 10 central agencies to intercept, monitor and decrypt any computer system.

The petition filed by advocate Manohar Lal Sharma seeks quashing of the government's December 20 notification.

According to the government's notification, 10 central probe and snoop agencies are now empowered under the Information Technology (IT) Act for computer interception and analysis, Ministry of Home Affairs officials said.

The 10 agencies notified under the new order are the Intelligence Bureau, Narcotics Control Bureau, Enforcement Directorate, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (for Income Tax Department), Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Central Bureau of Investigation, National Investigation Agency, the Research and Analysis Wing, Directorate of Signal Intelligence (in service areas of J-K, North East and Assam) and Delhi Police commissioner.

In his petition, Sharma termed the notification as "illegal, unconstitutional and ultra vires to the law".

He also sought to prohibit the agencies from initiating any criminal proceedings, enquiry or investigation against anybody under the provisions of the IT Act based on the notification.

The plea claimed that the notification was issued "to find political opponent, thinker and speaker to control entire country under dictatorship to win coming general election under an undisclosed emergency as well as slavery which cannot be permitted within the Constitution of India".

It alleged that the Ministry of Home Affairs' "blanket surveillance order must be tested against fundamental right to privacy".

As per the notification, the state has the right to access every communication, computer and mobile and "to use it to protect political interest and object of the present executive political party", the petition alleged.

The government's move authorising the 10 central agencies to intercept information from any computer had set off a political storm with the opposition accusing the Centre of trying to create a "surveillance state".

However, the central government had said the rules for intercepting and monitoring computer data were framed in 2009 when the Congress-led UPA was in power and its new order only notified the designated authority which can carry out such action.

Show Full Article
Next Story