Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
Political dimensions of peoples verdict
access_time 24 Nov 2024 3:45 AM GMT
Adani and his group buying governments
access_time 23 Nov 2024 6:53 AM GMT
Trump
access_time 22 Nov 2024 2:47 PM GMT
election commmission
access_time 22 Nov 2024 4:02 AM GMT
Champions Trophy tournament
access_time 21 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The illness in health care
access_time 20 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
DEEP READ
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Foreign espionage in the UK
access_time 22 Oct 2024 8:38 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightProduce Vijay Mallya...

Produce Vijay Mallya before us on Oct 5, SC tells MHA

text_fields
bookmark_border
Produce Vijay Mallya before us on Oct 5, SC tells MHA
cancel

New Delhi: Dismissing Vijay Mallya's plea seeking review of a 2017 judgment which held him guilty for contempt of court, the Supreme Court on Monday sought the fugitive business tycoon be produced before it on October 5.

The top court had held him guilty of contempt, as Mallya did not truthfully disclose the full account of his assets.

On Monday, a bench comprising Justices U.U. Lalit and Ashok Bhushan, dismissing the review petition, said: "In our considered view, the attempt on part of the respondent No 3 (Vijay Mallya) to have a re-hearing in the matter cannot be permitted nor do the submissions make out any error apparent on record to justify interference in review jurisdiction. These Review Petitions are, therefore, dismissed."

The top court told Mallya to appear before it on October 5 at 2 p.m. and also directed the Ministry of Home Affairs to facilitate and ensure his presence.

Mallya was also found guilty for violating a court order by siphoning $40 million from his account, as he was restrained from making any such withdrawal. Earlier, the top court had directed Mallya to be present before it in July 2017.

The apex court noted that the reply on January 30, 2017 had reiterated the submissions advanced earlier by Mallya and had not in any way contradicted the oral undertaking given to the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Bengaluru and the orders passed by the Karnataka High Court or had offered any explanation why the said oral undertaking and the orders could not be relied upon.

The top court noted that Mallya's counsel advanced submissions touching upon the questions whether the directions issued by this court were violated and whether this court ought to have proceeded to exercise contempt jurisdiction when the contempt, on second count, was of the orders passed by the Karnataka High Court.

The apex court's order came on a review plea filed by Mallya against the July 14, 2017 judgment wherein he was found guilty of contempt for not paying Rs 9,000 crore dues to banks despite repeated directions. On June 19, the Supreme Court had sought explanation from its registry regarding Mallya's appeal. The bench said that according to the record placed before it, the review petition was not listed before the court for the last three years.

In 2017, the apex court passed the order on a contempt petition against Mallya by a consortium of banks led by the State Bank of India.

Show Full Article
TAGS:Supreme CourtVijay MallyaHome Ministryproduce 4 OCt
Next Story