Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
The future of INDIA bloc
access_time 7 May 2026 10:16 AM IST
When hate-driven tactics run rampant
access_time 6 May 2026 9:42 AM IST
Lessons from a miserable defeat
access_time 5 May 2026 10:18 AM IST
The sanctity of election
access_time 4 May 2026 9:30 AM IST
DEEP READ
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_right‘Jana Gana Mana’s’...

‘Jana Gana Mana’s’ status to ‘Vande Mataram’: Muslim body slams move

text_fields
bookmark_border
‘Jana Gana Mana’s’ status to ‘Vande Mataram’: Muslim body slams move
cancel

New Delhi: With the Union Cabinet giving 'Vande Mataram' the same statutory protection as the national anthem 'Jana Gana Mana', the All India Muslim Personal Law Board on Thursday said the move was a direct violation of constitutional rights, including religious freedom, and demanded its withdrawal, PTI reported.

The Union Cabinet has approved a proposal to amend the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971, to make any obstruction to the singing of the national song 'Vande Mataram' a punishable offence.

This gives 'Vande Mataram' the same statutory protection as the national anthem 'Jana Gana Mana'. The Act, at present, protects the national anthem, the national flag and the Constitution from any insults.

The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) has "strongly" rejected the decision of the Union Cabinet to accord 'Vande Mataram' a status equal to the national anthem 'Jana Gana Mana' to make all six stanzas of the song compulsory, and to mandate its recitation before the national anthem in all government and educational institutions, the Board said in a statement.

The AIMPLB claimed that the move was a "direct violation" of the basic spirit of the Constitution of India, religious freedom, secular values, and the historic decisions of the Constituent Assembly.

It demanded that the government immediately withdraw this decision.

AIMPLB spokesperson S Q R Ilyas said that the Cabinet's decision is not only "unconstitutional and undemocratic", but also contrary to the religious and cultural diversity and constitutional ethos of the country.

He stated that a secular state cannot impose the religious concepts or beliefs of one community upon all citizens by force.

Several stanzas of 'Vande Mataram' contain invocations and glorification of Goddess Durga and other deities, which are in direct conflict with the Islamic doctrine of the absolute oneness of God, Ilyas said.

He pointed out that in 1937, following the advice of Rabindranath Tagore, the Congress had itself decided that only the first two stanzas of 'Vande Mataram' should be used, since the later stanzas were religious in character and could not be acceptable to all sections of society.

Keeping this reality in view, the Constituent Assembly in 1950 also accepted only the first two stanzas as the national song, he said.

Show Full Article
TAGS:Union CabinetAll India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB)Vande Mataram debate
Next Story