Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
What the Economic Survey says
access_time 31 Jan 2026 9:38 AM IST
Election-time populist manifesto
access_time 30 Jan 2026 9:34 AM IST
Return of Manusmriti as a civilisational code
access_time 29 Jan 2026 12:38 PM IST
Can never forget, Mark Tully
access_time 29 Jan 2026 11:03 AM IST
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_right‘Disgusting': SC...

‘Disgusting': SC chides judicial officer who peed before woman in train

text_fields
bookmark_border
‘Disgusting: SC chides judicial officer who peed before woman in train
cancel
camera_alt

Representational (AI generated).

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday stayed a Madhya Pradesh High Court order that quashed the termination of a judicial officer who allegedly created a nuisance and urinated in front of the berth of a woman co-passenger onboard a train in 2018, PTI reported.

Terming the civil judge's conduct as "disgusting", a bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta observed that it was a "shocking" case and he should have been dismissed.

It issued a notice to the judicial officer and the Madhya Pradesh government seeking their responses on the petition filed by the high court's administrative side against a May last year order of the high court's division bench that had quashed the termination order of September 2019 and had directed that the judicial officer be reinstated within 15 days.

"You should have been dismissed," the apex court bench said.

"Issue notice, returnable within four weeks. In the meantime, effect and operation of the impugned judgement shall remain stayed," the top court said while posting the matter for hearing after six weeks.

The judicial officer was appointed to the post of Civil Judge, class-II, in March 2011, and it was alleged that in June 2018, when he was travelling in a train, he misbehaved, harassed the co-passengers in a drunken state and undertook certain obscene activities.

It was also alleged that in the state of intoxication, he urinated in front of the berth of a woman co-passenger and due to the nuisance, passengers had to pull the chain, and the train was delayed.

He was arrested and, since the offence was bailable, was released on bail.

Show Full Article
TAGS:Supreme CourtIndia NewsPublic nuisance
Next Story