Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
Trump
access_time 22 Nov 2024 2:47 PM GMT
election commmission
access_time 22 Nov 2024 4:02 AM GMT
Champions Trophy tournament
access_time 21 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The illness in health care
access_time 20 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The fire in Manipur should be put out
access_time 21 Nov 2024 9:19 AM GMT
America should also be isolated
access_time 18 Nov 2024 11:57 AM GMT
DEEP READ
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Foreign espionage in the UK
access_time 22 Oct 2024 8:38 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightWorldchevron_rightMore permanent members...

More permanent members in UNSC might lead to paralysis, says Pak

text_fields
bookmark_border
More permanent members in UNSC might lead to paralysis, says Pak
cancel

Pakistan on Tuesday opposed the efforts by India, Brazil, Germany and Japan for permanent seats in the United National Security Council (UNSC).

There is no justification for creating new centres of privilege within the UN, said Ambassador Munir Akram, Pakistan's Permanent Representative to the UN.

"Any country seeking a more frequent presence on the Security Council should do so by subjecting itself to the democratic process of periodic election by the General Assembly," Munir maintained.

Munir referred to the Italy/ Pakistan-led Uniting for Consensus (UfC) group and said that the group remains opposed to proposals for permanent membership for individual member states. The group had pled an expansion of the 15-member council in the two-year, non-permanent category. The UfC believes that its proposal for a comprehensive reform of the UNSC is the best basis for a compromise, he added. Considering the inability of permanent members to agree on decisive action, more permanent members would only increase the chances of inaction, the report said.

Show Full Article
TAGS:UNSCIndiapermanent membership
Next Story