Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
Hundred days of VD Satheesan government
access_time 26 Aug 2026 9:30 AM IST
No, this PM Cared little
access_time 24 Aug 2026 11:42 AM IST
Economic D-Day or D-Day of US-Iran war?
access_time 22 Aug 2026 9:46 AM IST
Do not forget this martyr
access_time 22 Aug 2026 9:30 AM IST
DEEP READ
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 11:16 AM IST
Horrible shame!
access_time 21 July 2026 3:27 PM IST
Is Cuba going to succumb to US sanctions?
access_time 24 April 2026 3:08 PM IST
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightWorldchevron_rightMore permanent members...

More permanent members in UNSC might lead to paralysis, says Pak

text_fields
bookmark_border
More permanent members in UNSC might lead to paralysis, says Pak
cancel

Pakistan on Tuesday opposed the efforts by India, Brazil, Germany and Japan for permanent seats in the United National Security Council (UNSC).

There is no justification for creating new centres of privilege within the UN, said Ambassador Munir Akram, Pakistan's Permanent Representative to the UN.

"Any country seeking a more frequent presence on the Security Council should do so by subjecting itself to the democratic process of periodic election by the General Assembly," Munir maintained.

Munir referred to the Italy/ Pakistan-led Uniting for Consensus (UfC) group and said that the group remains opposed to proposals for permanent membership for individual member states. The group had pled an expansion of the 15-member council in the two-year, non-permanent category. The UfC believes that its proposal for a comprehensive reform of the UNSC is the best basis for a compromise, he added. Considering the inability of permanent members to agree on decisive action, more permanent members would only increase the chances of inaction, the report said.

Show Full Article
TAGS:UNSCIndiapermanent membership
Next Story