Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
Can Trump wield his big stick?
access_time 22 Nov 2024 10:39 AM GMT
election commmission
access_time 22 Nov 2024 4:02 AM GMT
Champions Trophy tournament
access_time 21 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The illness in health care
access_time 20 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The fire in Manipur should be put out
access_time 21 Nov 2024 9:19 AM GMT
America should also be isolated
access_time 18 Nov 2024 11:57 AM GMT
DEEP READ
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Foreign espionage in the UK
access_time 22 Oct 2024 8:38 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightSportschevron_rightNational anti-doping...

National anti-doping agency suspends Bajrang Punia again, issues notice of charge

text_fields
bookmark_border
Bajrang Punia
cancel

On Sunday, the National Anti-Doping Agency (NADA) suspended wrestler Bajrang Punia for a second time, just three weeks after the Anti-Disciplinary Doping Panel (ADDP) had lifted his initial suspension.

The ADDP had revoked the suspension on May 31, citing that NADA had not yet issued a 'notice of charge' to the Tokyo Games bronze medallist.

Bajrang Punia was initially suspended on April 23 for refusing to provide a urine sample during the selection trials in Sonepat on March 10. The refusal led to a suspension from both NADA and the World Governing Body UWW.

Following the revocation of his provisional suspension, NADA has now formally charged Bajrang with a violation of Article 2.3 of the National Anti-Doping Rules, 2021, and re-imposed the suspension. Bajrang has until July 11 to request a hearing or accept the charge.

In his defense, Bajrang maintains that he did not refuse to give a sample but sought clarification from NADA regarding the use of expired kits for his sample collection in December 2023. He stated that he only wanted NADA to respond to his email about the expired kits before submitting his urine sample.

NADA clarified the reasons for their actions, stating that the chaperone/DCO had approached Bajrang and informed him of the requirement to provide a urine sample for doping analysis. Despite repeated requests and detailed explanations of the consequences of non-compliance, Bajrang refused to provide the sample unless his query regarding the expired kits was addressed.

NADA emphasized that if the Anti-Doping Rule Violation (ADRV) is upheld, it will seek the disqualification of results from the event during which the violation occurred, including the forfeiture of any medals, points, and prizes. Additionally, NADA may choose to recover financial costs associated with the violation and impose a fine as stipulated under the NADR, 2021.

Show Full Article
TAGS:Bajrang Punia
Next Story