Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
election commmission
access_time 22 Nov 2024 4:02 AM GMT
Champions Trophy tournament
access_time 21 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The illness in health care
access_time 20 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The fire in Manipur should be put out
access_time 21 Nov 2024 9:19 AM GMT
America should also be isolated
access_time 18 Nov 2024 11:57 AM GMT
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
DEEP READ
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Foreign espionage in the UK
access_time 22 Oct 2024 8:38 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightSupreme Court rejects...

Supreme Court rejects convicts' plea in Bilkis Bano case

text_fields
bookmark_border
Supreme Court
cancel

The Supreme Court, on Friday, declined to consider a plea by two of the 11 convicts in the Bilkis Bano case, who were challenging the January 8 verdict that annulled their remission.

The bench, comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Sanjay Kumar, described the plea as "absolutely misconceived." The judges questioned the validity of the plea, emphasizing that the court cannot review an order passed by another bench of the Supreme Court.

"This plea is absolutely misconceived. How can an Article 32 petition be filed to challenge an order passed by another bench? We can't sit in appeal over an order passed by another bench," stated Justice Khanna.

Advocate Rishi Malhotra, representing convicts Radheyshyam Bhagwandas Shah and Rajubhai Babulal Soni, sought permission to withdraw the plea. Shah has also applied for interim bail.

In March, the convicts approached the Supreme Court, arguing that the January 8 verdict canceling their remission was in violation of a 2002 constitution bench order. They requested that the issue be referred to a larger bench for a definitive ruling.

Show Full Article
TAGS:Supreme CourtBilkis Bano
Next Story