Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
Champions Trophy tournament
access_time 21 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The illness in health care
access_time 20 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The fire in Manipur should be put out
access_time 21 Nov 2024 9:19 AM GMT
America should also be isolated
access_time 18 Nov 2024 11:57 AM GMT
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
The betrayal of the highest order
access_time 16 Nov 2024 12:22 PM GMT
DEEP READ
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Foreign espionage in the UK
access_time 22 Oct 2024 8:38 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightSC to hear on Friday...

SC to hear on Friday Rahul's appeal against Gujarat HC's denial of stay on his conviction

text_fields
bookmark_border
SC to hear on Friday Rahuls appeal against Gujarat HCs denial of stay on his conviction
cancel

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday said it will hear on July 21 former Congress President Rahul Gandhi's plea against the Gujarat High Court's verdict denying a stay on his conviction in the 'Modi surname' defamation case.

A bench headed by Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud directed to list the matter on Friday after senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Rahul Gandhi, sought urgent listing of the matter.

Singhvi requested the top court to list the plea either on Friday (July 21) or Monday (July 24). The court agreed to list the matter for hearing this Friday.

It is to be noted that in the absence of any stay on the conviction so far, the Lok Sabha's action o disqualifying Rahul as an MP took effect without any recourse open before him.

It was on July 15 that the Congress leader approached the Supreme Court against the Gujarat High Court's refusal to stay his conviction and two-year jail term in a criminal defamation case, which cost the Congress leader his Lok Sabha membership.

A bench of Justice Hemant Prachchhak of the high court had observed that granting a stay on his conviction would be an exception, and not a rule.

Rahul Gandhi was disqualified as a Member of Parliament in March after a Surat court convicted him and sentenced him to two years in prison for his "How come all thieves have Modi as the common surname" remark made during an election rally in Karnataka in April 2019.

Meanwhile, Purnesh Modi, a BJP MLA and the complainant in the defamation case against Gandhi, had in anticipation of Rahul's appeal in the apex court, submitted a caveat in the Supreme Court requesting for a chance to present his case if the Congress leader challenges the high court verdict.

A caveat serves as a notice submitted to an appellate court by a litigant who wishes to be heard in case any orders are issued regarding an opponent's appeal that challenges the decision or judgment made by the lower court.

Rahul Gandhi's 2019 remark was interpreted as an attempt to draw an implicit connection between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and fugitive businessmen Nirav Modi and Lalit Modi.

In March, the sessions court in Surat had dismissed Rahul Gandhi's plea seeking suspension of his conviction by the magistrate court, stating that his disqualification will not result in an irreversible loss to him.

According to legal experts, if the top court stays Rahul Gandhi's conviction, it would be sufficient to restore his Lok Sabha membership. The Congress leader was disqualified under a rule that bars convicted MPs from holding Lok Sabha membership in addition a bar on contesting elections for six years.

(Inputs from IANS)

Show Full Article
TAGS:Rahul GandhidefamationGujarat High Court
Next Story