Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
election commmission
access_time 22 Nov 2024 4:02 AM GMT
Champions Trophy tournament
access_time 21 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The illness in health care
access_time 20 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The fire in Manipur should be put out
access_time 21 Nov 2024 9:19 AM GMT
America should also be isolated
access_time 18 Nov 2024 11:57 AM GMT
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
DEEP READ
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Foreign espionage in the UK
access_time 22 Oct 2024 8:38 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightSC imposes fine on 8...

SC imposes fine on 8 political parties for not publishing criminal antecedents of candidates in Bihar polls

text_fields
bookmark_border
SC imposes fine on 8 political parties for not publishing criminal antecedents of candidates in Bihar polls
cancel

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday held nine major political parties guilty of contempt and fined eight of them, including the Congress and the BJP, for not publishing the criminal antecedents of candidates during the Bihar assembly polls last year.

Rupees Five Lakhs each have been imposed as fine on Communist Party of India( Marxist) and Nationalist Congress Party as the court found that CPI(M) and NCP are the two parties who has not submitted the Form C7 or C8 for any of its candidates and therefore is fully non-compliant with it February 2020 judgment on making public criminal records of candidates selected for polls.

The Court also directed BJP, Congress, Janta Dal, Rashtriya Janata Dal(United), Communist Party of India and Lok Janshakti Party to pay fine of Rupees One Lakh each as they were found to be in partial non-compliance.

The court observed that CPI(M) and NCP have not at all complied with the directions issued by it in January 2020.

"Insofar as Respondent Nos 8 (Communist Party of India-Marxist) and 9 (Nationalist Congress Party) are concerned, since they have not at all complied with the directions issued by this court, we direct them to deposit an amount of Rs 5 lakh each in the aforesaid account within the aforesaid period." a bench consisting of Justices R F Nariman and B R Gavai said

The bench added: "Though we have held the Respondent No 3 to 9, 11 and 12 guilty of having committed contempt of our order dated February 13, 2020, taking into consideration that these were the first elections which were conducted after issuance of our directions, we are inclined to take a lenient view in the matter."

It warned the parties that they should be cautious in future and ensure that the directions issued by it as well as the Election Commission are followed in letter and spirit. "We direct the Respondent Nos 3,4,5,6,7, and 11 to deposit an amount of Rs 1 lakh each in the account created by the ECI as specified in this judgment in paragraph 73(iii) within a period of 8 weeks from the date of this judgment," added the bench.

The top court also asked the Election Commission to create a mobile app that has the information for voters to access easily. "The ECI is directed to create a dedicated mobile application containing information published by candidates regarding their criminal antecedents, so that at one stroke, each voter gets such information on his/her mobile phone," it said.

In another step towards decriminalising politics, the top court said the details of the candidates with criminal background should be published within 48 hours of their selection. "It is clarified that the details which are required to be published, shall be published within 48 hours of the selection of the candidate and not prior to two weeks before the first date of filing of nominations," it added.

The top court delivered the judgment on a petition, which sought suspending the symbol of political parties, which do not disclose the criminal backgrounds of their candidates. The petitions asked for contempt against political parties for not obeying the court judgment, in the Bihar election, held in November last year.

Last year's ruling had said all political parties should explain why they chose candidates with a criminal background and release details of the cases on their party's website in addition with the reasons for selecting such candidates. The Election Commission had directed political parties to publish this information on candidates in newspapers.

Show Full Article
TAGS:Bihar pollsSupreme Court of IndiaDecriminalising Politics
Next Story