Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
election commmission
access_time 22 Nov 2024 4:02 AM GMT
Champions Trophy tournament
access_time 21 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The illness in health care
access_time 20 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The fire in Manipur should be put out
access_time 21 Nov 2024 9:19 AM GMT
America should also be isolated
access_time 18 Nov 2024 11:57 AM GMT
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
DEEP READ
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Foreign espionage in the UK
access_time 22 Oct 2024 8:38 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_right'Public person should...

'Public person should be thick skinned': Delhi HC to Gautam Gambhir

text_fields
bookmark_border
Public person should be thick skinned: Delhi HC to Gautam Gambhir
cancel

New Delhi: In a plea by former Indian cricketer Gautam Gambhir seeking a restrain on the Hindi newspaper Punjab Kesari against publishing 'defamatory' stories against him, the Delhi High Court refused to make an interim order in favour of him, The Indian Express reported.

The court commented that Gambhir is an elected person, a public servant and need not be so sensitive. Any public person should be thick-skinned, and judges also these days.

The court issued notice to the defendant newspaper on the application filed by Gambhir. Then it listed the matter to October for further hearing.

Gambhir had moved the court seeking a mandatory injunction so that the court should direct the newspaper, as well as its reports issue an unconditional apology over alleged malicious and false publications. It also sought the removal of all defamatory content from the newspaper's website and a direction restricting no such publications anymore.

Further, Gambhir also requested that since the main lawsuit is pending, the defendants needed to be directed to immediately withdraw the defamatory publication mentioned in the lawsuit.

Gambhir's counsel Jai Dehadrai cited seven articles beginning from May 2022 published by the paper. The lawyer argued that the paper targeted the cricketer, arguing that it is not a situation of fair and objective reporting but fallacious and defamatory.

The counsel wondered how two reporters could attack him in the same style, saying that Gambhir was busy with IPL (Indian Premier League) and not interested in his consistency. He added that no reporters sought Gambhir's opinion before publishing such reports.

Show Full Article
TAGS:Delhi High CourtGautam Gambhirdefamation case
Next Story