Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
election commmission
access_time 22 Nov 2024 4:02 AM GMT
Champions Trophy tournament
access_time 21 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The illness in health care
access_time 20 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The fire in Manipur should be put out
access_time 21 Nov 2024 9:19 AM GMT
America should also be isolated
access_time 18 Nov 2024 11:57 AM GMT
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
DEEP READ
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Foreign espionage in the UK
access_time 22 Oct 2024 8:38 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightGujarat Govt removes...

Gujarat Govt removes security, raising concern for 2002 riot witnesses' safety

text_fields
bookmark_border
Gujarat Govt removes security, raising concern for 2002 riot witnesses safety
cancel

Ahmedabad: The Gujarat government has decided to revoke the security cover for witnesses, lawyers, and a former judge involved in the 2002 Gujarat riots cases. The decision, made on December 13 by the Gujarat Police, follows a recommendation from Special Investigation Team (SIT) chief BC Solanki.

The security covers, provided by the witness protection cell formed 15 years ago based on Supreme Court recommendations, encompassed cases related to the communal riots, including the Godhra train burning case, Naroda Patia case, Naroda Gam case, Gulbarg society massacre case, Dipda Darwaza case, Sardarpur and Ode case.

Over 2,000 people, mostly Muslims, lost their lives in the tragic events of 2002, and Prime Minister Narendra Modi was the Chief Minister of Gujarat at that time.

Former principal city sessions judge Jyotsna Yagnik, who convicted 32 individuals in the Naroda Patia case, was among those receiving security cover from the witness protection cell.

The move has raised concerns among witnesses and the legal community, especially considering that many cases are still pending in court, with a significant number of accused individuals out on bail.

Imtiyazkhan Pathan, the prime witness in the Gulbarg Society massacre case, expressed dissatisfaction with the withdrawal of police protection. Pathan questioned the propriety of such a decision, highlighting the potential risks faced by those involved in the cases.

He even suggested that witnesses should be granted arms licenses for self-protection if police protection is removed.

The controversial move by the Gujarat Police has ignited a debate on the responsibility for the safety of those involved in the cases.

As the legal proceedings continue, the decision to withdraw security cover has added another layer of complexity to the longstanding aftermath of the 2002 Gujarat riots.

Show Full Article
TAGS:Communal violenceGujarat Government2002 Gujarat riot
Next Story