Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
Trump
access_time 22 Nov 2024 2:47 PM GMT
election commmission
access_time 22 Nov 2024 4:02 AM GMT
Champions Trophy tournament
access_time 21 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The illness in health care
access_time 20 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The fire in Manipur should be put out
access_time 21 Nov 2024 9:19 AM GMT
America should also be isolated
access_time 18 Nov 2024 11:57 AM GMT
DEEP READ
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Foreign espionage in the UK
access_time 22 Oct 2024 8:38 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_right'Forced' religious...

'Forced' religious conversion to be illegal in Gujarat from June 15

text_fields
bookmark_border
Forced religious conversion to be illegal in Gujarat from June 15
cancel

Ahmedabad: Gujarat Chief Minister Vijay Rupani informed on Friday that the Gujarat Freedom of Religion (Amendment) Act, 2021, will come into force from June 15 following the Governor's assent recently.

The Gujarat Legislative Assembly passed the stringent legislation that prohibits 'forcible' religious conversions by marriage on April 1 amidst opposition by Congress, who alleged that the bill could make political capital and create a religious divide. Forced marriages for religious conversion include those by "allurement, force or by misrepresentation or by any other fraudulent means".

The recent Act amends the Gujarat Freedom of Religion Act 2003, and anyone found carrying out religious conversion by marriage or getting a person married or by aiding a person to get married shall be punished with imprisonment of not less than three years and up to five years and will also be liable to pay a fine of Rs 2 lakh. Any marriage done thus would be declared null by the family court or any similar court.

The offence of such religious conversion through marriage shall be considered cognizable and non-bailable and investigated by an official over the rank of a Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP). The burden of proof shall rest upon the accused.

The opposition slammed the bill as proof that the 2003 bill itself was meaningless and that sections 406, 417, and 419 also address the issue intended to be covered by the bill. They further noted that despite claiming the bill to be against 'love jihad', the bill nowhere mentions it.

Show Full Article
TAGS:GujaratFreedom of religion
Next Story