Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
The illness in health care
access_time 20 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
Manipurs flames must be quelled
access_time 19 Nov 2024 11:52 AM GMT
America should also be isolated
access_time 18 Nov 2024 11:57 AM GMT
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
The betrayal of the highest order
access_time 16 Nov 2024 12:22 PM GMT
DEEP READ
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Foreign espionage in the UK
access_time 22 Oct 2024 8:38 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightLifestylechevron_rightEducationchevron_rightSC declines plea...

SC declines plea seeking extra chance to UPSC candidates who missed last attempt due to pandemic

text_fields
bookmark_border
SC declines plea seeking extra chance to UPSC candidates who missed last attempt due to pandemic
cancel

New Delhi:The Supreme Court on Thursday declined to issue directions to the Centre and the UPSC to grant an extra attempt to aspirants, who exhausted their last attempt at the prestigious civil services exam in October last year.

"The petitioners have made an unsuccessful attempt of persuading us to take a view that the issue raised in the present writ petitions is not covered by the decision of three judge Bench of this Court dated February 24, 2021 in Rachna & Ors vs Union of India & Anr...," the bench said in its order.

A bench of Justices A.M. Khanwilkar and Sanjiv Khanna said: "Although, we may have full sympathy with writ petitioners and similarly placed students, for the difficult situation and the resultant consequences they may suffer, but the issues raised by them, in our opinion, are covered by the decision of this Court in Rachna & Ors. (supra)."

Though the writ petitioners argued that they form a separate class - as they were forced not to appear in the examination on the given dates on account of directions issued by the local authorities under the Disaster Management Act, 2005, the aprx court noted that the only indulgence that can be shown to the petitioners, including the applicants, is to allow them to make representation to the appropriate authority, who may consider all aspects of the matter and take a lenient view in the light of the prevailing situation at the relevant time.

"We are not expressing any opinion either way with regard to the feasibility of resolution of the issues so raised. All aspects in that regard are left open," said the bench, disposing of the petitions.

"Instead of appealing to us, why not appeal to the authority that made the policy?", the top court asked.

Counsel, appearing for some of the petitioners, argued the judgment in the Rachna case dealt with only those candidates who had given the examination in 2020, and did not cover those who could not appear in the exam due to Covid-related difficulties and became age-barred for the 2021 exam.

Show Full Article
TAGS:SCcovid19UPSC candidates
Next Story