Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
election commmission
access_time 22 Nov 2024 4:02 AM GMT
Champions Trophy tournament
access_time 21 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The illness in health care
access_time 20 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The fire in Manipur should be put out
access_time 21 Nov 2024 9:19 AM GMT
America should also be isolated
access_time 18 Nov 2024 11:57 AM GMT
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightPetition to shift PILs...

Petition to shift PILs on uniform age of marriage from state courts to SC

text_fields
bookmark_border
Petition to shift PILs on uniform age of marriage from state courts to SC
cancel

The Supreme Court has taken note of a petition filed regarding moving two petitions requesting uniform minimum age of marriage for male and female genders from the Rajasthan and Delhi High Courts to the Supreme Court itself. It has also issued a notice to the Center on this matter.

The petition filed by lawyer Ashwini Kumar seeks to transfer these pending petitions to the Supreme Court so that there would be less chance of multiple litigations or misinterpretation of key articles of the law.

The petitioner has also filed that the existing minimum age requirements (18 for women and 21 for men) are 'unscientific' and contravenes assurances of gender equality made under India's International Human Rights obligations under the provisions of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women ("CEDAW"), which it ratified in 1993.

"A younger spouse is therefore expected to respect and be servile to her elder partner, which aggravates the pre-existing gender-based hierarchy in the marital relationship," reads the petition, reports LiveLaw.

The petitioner has also requested the Central Government to take appropriate steps to make the minimum age of marriage 'gender-neutral, religion-neutral and uniform for all citizens' in the spirit of the Articles 14, 15, 21 and International Conventions.

Show Full Article
TAGS:supreme courtMarriage agegender justice
Next Story