Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
Can Trump wield his big stick?
access_time 22 Nov 2024 10:39 AM GMT
election commmission
access_time 22 Nov 2024 4:02 AM GMT
Champions Trophy tournament
access_time 21 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The illness in health care
access_time 20 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The fire in Manipur should be put out
access_time 21 Nov 2024 9:19 AM GMT
America should also be isolated
access_time 18 Nov 2024 11:57 AM GMT
DEEP READ
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Foreign espionage in the UK
access_time 22 Oct 2024 8:38 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightMamata fined Rs 5...

Mamata fined Rs 5 lakh, Judge recuses from hearing Nandigram poll plea

text_fields
bookmark_border
Mamata fined Rs 5 lakh, Judge recuses from hearing Nandigram poll plea
cancel

Kolkata: Justice Kausik Chanda of the Calcutta High Court Wednesday recused himself from hearing West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee's petition challenging the election of Suvendu Adhikari from Nandigram, but not before imposing a cost of Rs 5 lakh on her.

The judge blamed Mamata for making a deliberate attempt to influence his decision before seeking the recusal application, and imposed the cost for the manner of seeking the recusal. He also directed that the amount be deposited to the Bar Council of West Bengal within two weeks.

"Such calculative, psychological and offensive attempt to seek recusal need to be firmly repulsed and a cost of Rs. 5 lakh is imposed upon Petitioner," he said in the order.

On June 24, Mamata's application that the judge recuse himself from hearing her election petition apprehending bias on his part, was reserved for order.

Following judge's recusal, Acting Chief Justice Rajesh Bindal will take the call on assigning it to a different bench.

Seeking his recusal, Mamata had claimed that Justice Chanda was an active member of the BJP till his appointment as the Additional Solicitor General of India in 2015 and since the subject of the petition was the electoral victory of a BJP candidate, there were apprehensions of bias in the adjudication of the election petition.

Justice Chanda had said that he was never a convenor of the BJP Legal Cell, but had appeared in many cases representing the party before the Calcutta High Court.

Banerjee's counsel had earlier written to the Acting Chief Justice of the High Court seeking reassignment of her election petition to another bench.

Show Full Article
TAGS:Mamata fined Rs 5 lakhrecusal requestelection petition NandigramCalcutta High Court
Next Story