Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
election commmission
access_time 22 Nov 2024 4:02 AM GMT
Champions Trophy tournament
access_time 21 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The illness in health care
access_time 20 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The fire in Manipur should be put out
access_time 21 Nov 2024 9:19 AM GMT
America should also be isolated
access_time 18 Nov 2024 11:57 AM GMT
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
DEEP READ
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Foreign espionage in the UK
access_time 22 Oct 2024 8:38 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightMadhya Pradesh HC...

Madhya Pradesh HC slams the trend of bulldozing houses without complying with procedures

text_fields
bookmark_border
Madhya Pradesh HC slams the trend of bulldozing houses without complying with procedures
cancel

The Madhya Pradesh High Court criticized the Ujjain Municipal Corporation for demolishing houses without adhering to the principles of natural justice, calling it a prevailing fashionable trend.

The court granted compensation of Rs 1 lakh to Radha Langri and Vimla Gurjar, whose homes were demolished without proper notice and procedure.

Langri, one of the petitioners, claimed that her houses were razed without any prior notice, while Gurjar, who received a demolition notice, obtained a stay from the High Court. In its ruling on February 1, Justice Vivek Rusia emphasized that local administrations and bodies seem to be arbitrarily demolishing homes without following due process.

The court noted that a criminal case had been registered against one of the family members of the petitioners, leading to the demolitions. However, it questioned the Ujjain civic body's claim that the houses were constructed without proper building permissions.

According to the Municipal Corporation, the petitioners were not recorded as owners in revenue records, and notices were served to individuals listed as owners. The court criticized the authenticity of the documents, pointing out a "concocted" note prepared by the building inspector in Langri's case.

The court expressed concern over the lack of on-site verification and highlighted the use of a fictitious person, Parvez Khan, in the demolition proceedings. It stated that serving a notice to a non-existent entity was "highly illegal and arbitrary," calling for disciplinary action against the officers involved.

While acknowledging the importance of building regulations, the court emphasized that demolition should be the last resort, urging a proper opportunity for owners to regularize their structures. The order directed the Commissioner of Ujjain Municipal Corporation to initiate disciplinary action against officers responsible for the forged documentation.

Show Full Article
TAGS:BulldozingMadhya Pradesh High Court
Next Story