Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
DEEP READ
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 10:48 PM IST
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 11:16 AM IST
What is Christmas?
access_time 24 Dec 2024 3:24 PM IST
Foreign espionage in the UK
access_time 22 Oct 2024 2:08 PM IST
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightSupreme Court seeks...

Supreme Court seeks data on disbursal of ex gratia to COVID-19 victims' kin

text_fields
bookmark_border
Supreme Court seeks data on disbursal of ex gratia to COVID-19 victims kin
cancel

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday directed the Centre to "gather information" from the States on the progress made by them in the disbursement of the ex gratia compensation of ₹50000 to the kin of those who died of COVID-19.

The top court also pulled up the Gujarat government for issuing a notification, constituting a scrutiny committee contrary to its directions.

A Bench of Justices MR Shah and BV Nagarathna also sought information on the headway made so far by the States in constituting grievance redressal committees to hear complaints made by the families regarding compensation payment.

The bench which sought to know from Solicitor General Tushar Mehta how many people have got the payment said he should collect the data from all the states, and a grievance redressal committee should be set up before the next date of hearing on November 29.

The bench was hearing an application seeking quashing of the October 29 resolution issued by the health and family welfare department of the Gujarat government, forming a 'COVID-19 death ascertaining committee'.

At the outset, Mr Mehta, appearing for the Gujarat government, said that an amended resolution has been issued under the court's direction of November 18 but it also needs some modification.

The bench said it wants to know who has issued the first notification and accountability has to be fixed.

When Mr Mehta said he is ready to take responsibility, Justice Shah said that the officer concerned, who has drafted the notification must take the responsibility.

Mr Mehta said senior IAS officer Manoj Aggarwal of the State is connected to the virtual hearing and he will assist the court.

The bench asked Mr Aggarwal as to who had drafted the notification and whose brainchild was the document.

Mr Aggarwal, who is the Additional Chief Secretary, said the file goes through different departments and finally the competent authority gives the approval.

Mr Mehta said that there are genuine concerns about fake claims being made and that's why a scrutiny committee was constituted to ascertain the claims.

The bench said, "This court has never asked for the setting up of a scrutiny committee. It will take more than a year for genuine victims to get their claims and get a certificate from the scrutiny committee. Kin of victims is required to come with a certificate from hospitals but which hospital has been giving the certificate for COVID deaths."

The bench said that at least 10,000 people have died according to the data of the state and just because false claims are being made does not mean the genuine persons will have to suffer.

Show Full Article
TAGS:Supreme courtCovid19 updates
Next Story