Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
No, this PM Cared little
access_time 24 Aug 2026 11:42 AM IST
Economic D-Day or D-Day of US-Iran war?
access_time 22 Aug 2026 9:46 AM IST
Do not forget this martyr
access_time 22 Aug 2026 9:30 AM IST
Obfuscating caste count behind census
access_time 20 Aug 2026 9:30 AM IST
DEEP READ
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 11:16 AM IST
Horrible shame!
access_time 21 July 2026 3:27 PM IST
Is Cuba going to succumb to US sanctions?
access_time 24 April 2026 3:08 PM IST
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightSudarshan TV editor...

Sudarshan TV editor gets Delhi HC relief in case over linking madrasa to ‘anti-national’ activities

text_fields
bookmark_border
Sudarshan TV editor gets Delhi HC relief in case over linking madrasa to ‘anti-national’ activities
cancel

The controversial editor of Sudarshan TV, Suresh Chavhanke, who is known for his divisive allegations against the Muslim community for which he has been censured, has received relief from the Delhi High Court, which stayed criminal proceedings against him for linking a madrasa to “anti-national” activities.

The case was brought by Mohammed Tufail Khan, who runs the Jamia Arabia Nizami Welfare Educational Society, a non-governmental organisation and madrasa providing shelter, food ,and clothing to around 70 orphaned children.

The case is based on a petition by Mohammed Tufail Khan, who runs the Jamia Arabia Nizami Welfare Educational Society, a non-governmental organisation and madrasa providing shelter, food and clothing to around 70 orphaned children, and his complaint also named Islamic scholar Mufti Wajahat Qasmi, Sudarshan TV and its director Maya Chavhanke, apart from Chavhanke.

He alleged that Qasmi had falsely accused his organisation of involvement in “anti-national” activities, receiving illicit funds and “brainwashing” children during broadcasts in August and September 2022.

According to the complaint, residents and media personnel entered Khan’s home in September that year, called him a “Bangladeshi” and publicised his telephone number. Khan said this resulted in death threats against him.

He further alleged that Sudarshan TV aired defamatory programmes targeting his organisation and subsequently hosted another programme in which derogatory allegations were made.

During proceedings, Chavhanke’s counsel submitted that he was merely an anchor of a television programme and that there was no criminal intention on his part. The High Court, in an order dated 21 August, directed that proceedings before the trial court remain stayed until the next hearing.

The case had earlier intensified after a city court, on 19 October, observed on a preliminary assessment that allegations made by Sudarshan TV in its broadcasts and social-media posts appeared to be defamatory.

On 6 April, the court had issued bailable warrants against Chavhanke and Sudarshan TV after they failed to appear. The warrants were subsequently cancelled on 30 May after their appearance was recorded.

Show Full Article
TAGS:Hate SpeechSudarshan TVAnti-Muslim hate
Next Story