Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
Can Trump wield his big stick?
access_time 22 Nov 2024 10:39 AM GMT
election commmission
access_time 22 Nov 2024 4:02 AM GMT
Champions Trophy tournament
access_time 21 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The illness in health care
access_time 20 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The fire in Manipur should be put out
access_time 21 Nov 2024 9:19 AM GMT
America should also be isolated
access_time 18 Nov 2024 11:57 AM GMT
DEEP READ
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Foreign espionage in the UK
access_time 22 Oct 2024 8:38 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightSC closes case against...

SC closes case against Isha Foundation: 'Both women living on free will'

text_fields
bookmark_border
SC closes case against Isha Foundation: Both women living on free will
cancel

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday closed proceedings in a case of illegal confinement against Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev’s Isha Foundation, India Today reported.

A bench headed by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud closed the case after two women, whose parents accused the foundation of having ‘brainwashed’ them and holding them in there against their will, said they are voluntarily residing at the organisation's ashram.

The apex court pulled up the Madras High Court for ordering a police investigation in the ashram over a habeas corpus petition (produce the body)filed by the women’s parents.

During the hearing of the case, the Chief Justice remarked that ‘These proceedings cannot be to malign people and malign institutions’.

After their parents filed the petition against the foundation, alleging that the two women aged 39 and 42 were held there against their will, the Madras High Court ordered a police investigation.

Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, representing Isha Foundation, told the court that the women had voluntarily joined the ashram when they were 24 and 27 years old.

After having virtual interaction with the two women and recording their statements, Chief Justice Chandrachud said that the case should have been closed after the women had testified that they were living at the ashram at their free will.

Chief Justice Chandrachud said: ‘We have spoken to both individuals, who have clearly expressed their voluntary stay at the Isha Foundation. Once that is established, no further direction is needed in this habeas corpus case’.

However, the apex court made it clear that its ruling was linked to the habeas corpus petition and would not interfere with the police investigation being carried out against the foundation.

Show Full Article
TAGS:Supreme CourtIndia News
Next Story