Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
Kamala or Trump?
access_time 5 Nov 2024 4:05 AM GMT
Break up or get dissolved
access_time 4 Nov 2024 4:01 AM GMT
Through oneness to autocracy
access_time 2 Nov 2024 4:58 AM GMT
In football too racism rules the roost
access_time 1 Nov 2024 4:26 AM GMT
The concerns raised by the census
access_time 31 Oct 2024 7:49 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightMadras HC seeks govt's...

Madras HC seeks govt's response in petition for winding up Jayalalithaa's death probe

text_fields
bookmark_border
Madras HC seeks govts response in petition for winding up Jayalalithaas death probe
cancel

Chennai: The Madras High Court on Friday sought the government's response in a public interest litigation (PIL) petition seeking directions to wind up the Justice A Arumughaswamy commission of inquiry tasked to enquire into the death of former Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa as per a report by Bar and Bench.

The Commission, headed by Justice (retd) A. Arumughaswamy, was constituted on August 25, 2017, and was supposed to complete its hearing within three months and submit a detailed report in both English and Tamil. However, the period of the commission's functioning was extended from time to time.

Thondan Subramani cited these extensions in his PIL, seeking that the court cease the operations of the Commission and prevent the huge loss of money for the state government.

A bench of Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, however, wondered as to why they should not direct the Justice Arumughaswamy Commission to complete the inquiry and to file a report in three months' time.

The management of the Apollo Hospital where the former Chief Minister died had approached the Supreme Court regarding the correctness of the commission's inquiry particularly the medical treatment provided to her. In 2019, the Supreme Court had stayed the entire proceedings of the commission following another petition moved by the Apollo hospital.

The petitioner, in his plea, said that there was no progress in the activities of the commission but the taxpayer's money was being spent. He also noed that neither the state government nor the commission had moved the Supreme Court to vacate the interim stay.

The court admitted the plea and directed the state government to file its report in six weeks' time on the PIL.

Show Full Article
TAGS:Madras high courtJayalalithaa
Next Story