Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
Champions Trophy tournament
access_time 21 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The illness in health care
access_time 20 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The fire in Manipur should be put out
access_time 21 Nov 2024 9:19 AM GMT
America should also be isolated
access_time 18 Nov 2024 11:57 AM GMT
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
The betrayal of the highest order
access_time 16 Nov 2024 12:22 PM GMT
DEEP READ
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Foreign espionage in the UK
access_time 22 Oct 2024 8:38 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightFather-son duo...

Father-son duo convicted by Delhi Court in 2020 riots case

text_fields
bookmark_border
Father-son duo convicted by Delhi Court in 2020 riots case
cancel

New Delhi: In a case involving the 2020 North East Delhi riots, a court here has found a father-and-son team guilty of rioting and setting fires, ruling the prosecution's case against them to be beyond a reasonable doubt.

Pulastya Pramachala, an additional sessions judge (ASJ), was hearing the case against Mithhan Singh and his son Jony Kumar.

The duo was accused of being part of a riotous mob that set many properties on fire in lane number 4 in Khajuri Khas on February 25, 2020.

"I find that it is proved beyond doubt against both the accused that they were part of the mob which burnt the property (of complainant Shabana Khatoon). Thus, they are held guilty of the offences under sections 147 (rioting) 148 (rioting, armed with a deadly weapon) 436 (mischief by fire or explosive substance with intent to destroy a house, etc) read with section 149 (every member of unlawful assembly guilty of the offence committed in prosecution of common object) of the Indian Penal Code and convicted accordingly," the judge said.

The court posted the matter for filing affidavits on April 19, following which the proceedings on sentencing will commence.

An unlawful assembly was established with the shared goal of harming the properties of a specific community, according to ASJ Pramachala, who took note of the statements of various public witnesses. The riotous mob also committed acts of vandalism and arson, according to the judge.

Regarding the claim that the two were members of the mob, the judge stated that none of the complainants, locals, or other witnesses backed the prosecution's evidence and refused to label the accused as mob members.

The judge stated that the prosecution witnesses Mohd. Tahir and Constable Rohtash were the only witnesses to identify the duo as mob members.

He said Tahir's testimony was "reliable" to show both accused were out in the lane and that they had joined the riotous mob raising slogans, while Constable Rohtash was the beat officer of the area and saw the duo as part of the mob that torched Khatoon's property.

Because there was no entry in the daily diary or formal report on the occurrence, the judge ruled that the police officer's testimony could not be discarded.

Based on the evidence of the two witnesses, there was "no doubt that both accused persons were part of the mob" that indulged in the incident of arson at Khatoon's property, the judge said.


With inputs from IANS


Show Full Article
TAGS:Delhi riotsNew Delhi
Next Story