Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
Trump
access_time 22 Nov 2024 2:47 PM GMT
election commmission
access_time 22 Nov 2024 4:02 AM GMT
Champions Trophy tournament
access_time 21 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The illness in health care
access_time 20 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The fire in Manipur should be put out
access_time 21 Nov 2024 9:19 AM GMT
America should also be isolated
access_time 18 Nov 2024 11:57 AM GMT
DEEP READ
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Foreign espionage in the UK
access_time 22 Oct 2024 8:38 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightCan't direct...

Can't direct Parliament on uniform laws for trusts & trustees: SC

text_fields
bookmark_border
Cant direct Parliament on uniform laws for trusts & trustees: SC
cancel

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has refused to admit a petition that sought a direction for a uniform law for trust and trustees, charities and charitable institutions, and religious endowments and institutions, IANS reported.

The SC bench headed by Justice D.Y. Chandrachud said, "it is a well-settled principle that no court issues a mandamus to the Parliament to pass a law".

The bench, also comprising Justice Surya Kant, told petitioner Advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay that the matter is within the domain of the Parliament and the court could not pass any direction. The prayer itself is an interference with the legislature's power, the bench observed.

It further said that the court does not wish the matter to be a publicity stunt, and it cannot direct Parliament or issue a mandamus.

The court said that if the petitioner is aggrieved by the provisions of the law, he could challenge it but have to produce the facts.

When Upadhyay contented that he had filed a PIL in the public interest, the court asked whether his property had been appropriated. It added that the court must be very careful when entertaining a PIL to challenge a law passed by Parliament.

The top court mentioned in its order, "Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, who appears in person, seeks the permission of the court to withdraw the petition so as to enable him to pursue such remedies as are available in law. The petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No opinion has been expressed by this court on any aspect of the petition."

Show Full Article
TAGS:Supreme CourtParliament
Next Story