Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
election commmission
access_time 22 Nov 2024 4:02 AM GMT
Champions Trophy tournament
access_time 21 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The illness in health care
access_time 20 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The fire in Manipur should be put out
access_time 21 Nov 2024 9:19 AM GMT
America should also be isolated
access_time 18 Nov 2024 11:57 AM GMT
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
DEEP READ
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Foreign espionage in the UK
access_time 22 Oct 2024 8:38 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightBogus, untenable:...

Bogus, untenable: NewsClick rejects Delhi Police charges, FIR

text_fields
bookmark_border
Bogus, untenable: NewsClick rejects Delhi Police charges, FIR
cancel

New Delhi: The NewsClick portal has rejected the allegations against it by the Delhi Police special cell that it accepted funds and instructions from China, to disrupt India's sovereignty, and dismissed them as “absurd”.

Calling the FIR “ex facie untenable and bogus," the portal said that it contains allegations that have surfaced repeatedly during investigations by three different government agencies- the Enforcement Directorate, the Economic Offences Wing, Delhi Police, and the Income tax department.

The statement comes days after the police arrested the portal's founder and editor-in-chief Prabir Purkayastha and its HR head Amit Chakravarty, hours after raiding the portal's journalists and 88 locations allegedly linked to it.

NewsClick stated on Friday night that it has never committed or encouraged violence, secession, or any illegal activities.

Also Read:NewsClick arrests: New York Times condemns using its report to silence journalists

"The allegations in the FIR, apart from being ex facie untenable and bogus, have been made time and again, in investigations by three government agencies – the Enforcement Directorate, the Economic Offences Wing, Delhi Police, and the income tax department," it said.

None of these investigations led to any chargesheets or complaints over the last three years, the portal said in a statement. Prabir was also granted interim protection in these investigations, it further said.

According to NewsClick, the latest FIR appears to have been registered to circumvent this protection and carry out illegal arrests under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).

The Delhi Police registered an FIR under sections 13, 16,17, 18 and 22C of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, and 153A, and 120B of the IPC.

A copy of the FIR was provided to NewsClick after a Delhi court's intervention.

Also Read:Attempt to silence brave voices: Citizens voice against action against NewsClick

NewsClick has in earlier statements as well, consistently denied receiving any funding or instructions from China or Chinese entities.

The company also stated that its coverage, which is freely available online, was sufficient to substantiate its claims.

NewsClick has maintained that the charges against them are nothing but a “blatant attempt to muzzle the free and independent press in India”.

The news portal has moved the Delhi High Court seeking the quashing of the FIR and the release of Prabir Purkayastha and Amit Chakraborty from their alleged illegal police custody.

The Delhi High Court, taking cognizance of the matter, issued notice today in response to the petitions filed by Prabir and Amit and scheduled further hearings for Monday.

The police are expected to question ten people, including senior journalists, on Monday.



Show Full Article
TAGS:Delhi policeIndia NewsUAPA ActNewsClick raid
Next Story