Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
Trump
access_time 22 Nov 2024 2:47 PM GMT
election commmission
access_time 22 Nov 2024 4:02 AM GMT
Champions Trophy tournament
access_time 21 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The illness in health care
access_time 20 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The fire in Manipur should be put out
access_time 21 Nov 2024 9:19 AM GMT
America should also be isolated
access_time 18 Nov 2024 11:57 AM GMT
DEEP READ
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Foreign espionage in the UK
access_time 22 Oct 2024 8:38 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightBhima Koregaon case:...

Bhima Koregaon case: Bombay HC seeks NIA reply on bail plea of activist Sudha Bharadwaj

text_fields
bookmark_border
Bhima Koregaon case: Bombay HC seeks NIA reply on bail plea of activist Sudha Bharadwaj
cancel

The Bombay High Court on Tuesday instructed the National Investigation Agency (NIA) to respond to the bail plea of activist Sudha Bharadwaj (60) by July 3.

A division bench comprising Justices S.S. Shinde and N.J. Jamadar has ordered NIA advocate Sandesh Patil to respond to the matter by filing an affidavit.

Bharadwaj has been in jail since August 28, 2018. She is one of the 16 accused in the Elgar Parishad case. The NIA had booked her under the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). She had sought default bail citing that the trial judge was not authorised to take cognisance of the charge sheet filed against her.

The activist is charged for the alleged inflammatory speeches at the Elgar Parishad conclave which took place on December 31, 2017. Pune Police had claimed that her speeches triggered the violence at Koregaon-Bhima war memorial the next day. The police have linked the incident to Maoist influence.

When the charge sheet was filed in February 2019, the judge presiding over the matter was not a special judge designated under NIA to hear cases pertaining to the UAPA. Bharadwaj had submitted documents gathered from the High Court using the TRI to demonstrate that Additional Sessions Judge Kishor Vadane is not authorised to take cognisance of the 1800-page supplementary charge sheet.

Advocate Yug Chaudhry representing Sudha Bharadwaj also challenged the order granted by the same judge in November 2018 which allowed the Pune Police time to file the charge sheet.

Sudha Bharadwaj is known for working in Chattisgarh as a trade unionist, activist, and lawyer for three decades. She is associated with Chhattisgarh Mukti Morcha (Mazdoor Karyakrta Committee).

Show Full Article
TAGS:Bhima Koregaon caseSudha Bharadwaj
Next Story