Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
Trump
access_time 22 Nov 2024 2:47 PM GMT
election commmission
access_time 22 Nov 2024 4:02 AM GMT
Champions Trophy tournament
access_time 21 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The illness in health care
access_time 20 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The fire in Manipur should be put out
access_time 21 Nov 2024 9:19 AM GMT
America should also be isolated
access_time 18 Nov 2024 11:57 AM GMT
DEEP READ
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Foreign espionage in the UK
access_time 22 Oct 2024 8:38 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightAAP leader Raghav...

AAP leader Raghav Chadha’s plea against ‘indefinite’ suspension from RS to be heard by SC

text_fields
bookmark_border
AAP leader Raghav Chadha’s plea against ‘indefinite’ suspension from RS to be heard by SC
cancel

New Delhi: Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Raghav Chadha has filed a plea contesting his indefinite suspension from the Rajya Sabha, which the Supreme Court is set to hear on October 16.

Mr. Chadha was suspended on August 11 for "gross violation of rules, misconduct, defiant attitude and contemptuous conduct"; a report by the privileges committee is pending. A bench consisting of Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, Justices J. B. Pardiwala and Manoj Misra is scheduled to hear the plea of Mr Chadha.

In his plea filed through advocate Shadan Farasat, the AAP leader has said the power to suspend indefinitely is dangerously open to excess and abuse.

"The power to suspend is meant only to be used as a shield and not as a sword, that is, it cannot be penal," the plea has said, adding that "the suspension is in clear breach of Rule 256 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the Council of States, which incorporates a categorical prohibition against the suspension of any member for a period exceeding the remainder of the session".

It has been noted that suspension beyond the remaining period of an ongoing session would not only be a grossly irrational measure but would also be violative of basic democratic values owing to the unessential deprivation of the member concerned and more importantly, the constituency remaining unrepresented in the House.

The plea has said suspension cannot have the effect of dismissal as, in terms of Article 101(4) of the Constitution, the effect of an indefinite suspension, particularly outside the period of a session is to de-facto create a vacancy after a period of 60 days.

On August 11, a motion was passed by a voice vote in the Rajya Sabha after it was moved by Leader of the House Piyush Goyal, who sought action against the AAP leader for including the names of some members of the Upper House without their consent in a proposed select committee for the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (Amendment) Bill, 2023.


With PTI inputs

Show Full Article
TAGS:Supreme CourtAAPRaghav Chadha
Next Story