Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
DEEP READ
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 11:16 AM IST
Espionage in the UK
access_time 13 Jun 2025 10:20 PM IST
Yet another air tragedy
access_time 13 Jun 2025 9:45 AM IST
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightBusinesschevron_rightSupreme Court clears...

Supreme Court clears decks for Reliance Com's asset sale

text_fields
bookmark_border
Supreme Court clears decks for Reliance Coms asset sale
cancel

New Delhi: In much-awaited relief to Reliance Communications (RCOM), the Supreme court on Thursday cleared the decks for the sale of its spectrum and optical fibre assets to Reliance Jio Infocomm as it vacated a stay granted by the High Court.


The bench comprising Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel and Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman vacated the stay by the Bombay High Court while hearing a batch of petitions by which the High Court had re-affirmed the stay of the sale of spectrum and optical fibre assets by the arbitration court.

However, on the stay on the sale of tower assets by Reliance Infratel by the National Company Law Tribunal in Kolkata, the top court has asked the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) to decide the matter in four weeks time.

RCOM's plea challenging the stay by the High Court was supported by the consortium of banks headed by State Bank of India, who have contended that the sale of spectrum and optical fibre assets would get them Rs 25,000 crore -- part of Rs 45,000 crore that they are owed by RCOM.

In a statement RCOM said: "There is now no bar in immediately completing the asset sales of spectrum, MCNs and real estate, and the same shall be concluded expeditiously."

It added: "On the stay granted by NCLT in favour of minority investors holding approximately four per cent shareholding in Reliance Infratel, which is limited to tower and fibre assets, the Supreme Court has not made any comments on merits, and has instead only directed RCOM and its lenders to follow due procedure, and file an appeal before the NCLAT, instead of directly approaching the Supreme Court."

Show Full Article
Next Story