Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
election commmission
access_time 22 Nov 2024 4:02 AM GMT
Champions Trophy tournament
access_time 21 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The illness in health care
access_time 20 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The fire in Manipur should be put out
access_time 21 Nov 2024 9:19 AM GMT
America should also be isolated
access_time 18 Nov 2024 11:57 AM GMT
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
DEEP READ
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Foreign espionage in the UK
access_time 22 Oct 2024 8:38 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightMahua questions Ethics...

Mahua questions Ethics Committee’s criminal jurisdiction in ‘cash-for-query’ allegation

text_fields
bookmark_border
Mahua questions Ethics Committee’s criminal jurisdiction in ‘cash-for-query’ allegation
cancel

New Delhi: Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra, who is facing the Parliament's Ethics Committee’s scrutiny over allegations of taking bribes for asking questions in the Lok Sabha, has questioned the Ethics Committee’s authority to examine allegations of criminality in the ongoing cash-for-query controversy.

Moitra, a vocal critic of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the BJP released a prepared response ahead of her scheduled appearance before the committee tomorrow. She asserted that the committee lacked the power to investigate criminal allegations and accused it of releasing her summons to the media prematurely.

In a letter addressed to committee chairperson Vinod Kumar Sonkar, Moitra claimed that the absence of such powers was intentionally maintained by the nation's founders to prevent potential misuse by a government with a brute majority in parliament.

She emphasized that parliamentary committees do not possess criminal jurisdiction and urged the committee to recognize its limitations, stating that allegations of criminality should be addressed by law enforcement agencies.

Moitra reiterated her demand to cross-examine businessman Darshan Hiranandani, who accused her of accepting questions from him to be raised in parliament. The revelation that Hiranandani used Moitra's parliamentary login ID and password to post questions from Dubai could potentially lead to a breach of privilege and suspension from parliament if proven.

The MP also criticized the ethics committee for not formulating a code of conduct for members and claimed that it had not held any sittings in the past two years. She urged the committee to approach each case objectively and fairly due to the lack of a structured code of conduct.

The cash-for-query controversy took a legal turn as Supreme Court Lawyer Jai Anant Dehadrai, who filed the initial complaint with the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), was cross-examined by the Ethics Committee on October 26. BJP MP Nishikant Dubey, who raised the allegations against Moitra, was allowed to explain his claims.

The Ethics Committee is expected to submit its report to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla "as early as possible," drawing parallels with the swift action taken in the infamous cash-for-questions scam in 2005 during the United Progressive Alliance's tenure.

Show Full Article
TAGS:Narendra ModiBJPMahua MoitraTrinamool CongressParliamentary Ethics Committeecash-for-query
Next Story