Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
The verdict of discernment
access_time 9 Dec 2025 10:00 AM IST
Isnt expelling citizens punishable?
access_time 8 Dec 2025 9:30 AM IST
Extreme weather and frenzied politics
access_time 6 Dec 2025 9:30 AM IST
Moral politics and morality of politicians
access_time 5 Dec 2025 9:30 AM IST
Trump, Zelensky
access_time 4 Dec 2025 11:08 AM IST
DEEP READ
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 11:16 AM IST
Espionage in the UK
access_time 13 Jun 2025 10:20 PM IST
Yet another air tragedy
access_time 13 Jun 2025 9:45 AM IST
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightWorldchevron_rightGoogle told employees...

Google told employees to delete messages to avoid antitrust suits: Report

text_fields
bookmark_border
Google told employees to delete messages to avoid antitrust suits: Report
cancel

New York: Internet giant Google reportedly used strategies, after it faced antitrust scrutiny over an advertising deal with its rival Yahoo 15 years ago, to avoid legal scrutiny by directing employees to destroy their internal text messages, according to The New York Times.

The tech giant has asked employees to refraining from using certain words in internal communication which could later play into the hands of government regulators or competitors serving as legal evidence.

Instructing them to refrain from speculation and sarcasm, Google wanted to them ‘think twice’ before writing about ‘hot topics’ and they should not comment before having all the facts.

Government regulations in the US made it mandate for the companies to preserve their documents anticipating legal action.

Google, however, reportedly tweaked its technology for internal communication to make deletion default.

An internal memo in 2011 directed its employees to avoid using ‘metaphors involving wars or sports, winning or losing’, alongside rejecting references to topics such as ‘markets’ ‘market share’ or ‘dominance’.

Employees were asked not to use phrases like ‘putting products in the hands of new customers’, claiming that regulators might interpret the term to accuse the company of denying consumers a ‘choice’.

Another strategy that the company adopted was encouraging employees to mark ‘attorney-client privileged’ on documents.

In addition they were instructed to add the company's lawyer to the list of recipients, even if an internal communication did not involve legal matters.

Meanwhile Google reportedly stated that the company ‘for years responded to inquiries and litigation’, adding that it took obligations to preserve and produce relevant documents.

Show Full Article
TAGS:World NewsUS news
Next Story