Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
Can Trump wield his big stick?
access_time 22 Nov 2024 10:39 AM GMT
election commmission
access_time 22 Nov 2024 4:02 AM GMT
Champions Trophy tournament
access_time 21 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The illness in health care
access_time 20 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The fire in Manipur should be put out
access_time 21 Nov 2024 9:19 AM GMT
America should also be isolated
access_time 18 Nov 2024 11:57 AM GMT
DEEP READ
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Foreign espionage in the UK
access_time 22 Oct 2024 8:38 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightWorldchevron_rightCanada's top court...

Canada's top court criminalises removal of condoms mid-intercourse

text_fields
bookmark_border
Canadas top court criminalises removal of condoms mid-intercourse
cancel

Ottawa: The Supreme Court of Canada on Friday ruled that the removal of a condom during sex without the permission of a partner is a crime, Asian News International reported, citing a report by The New York Times.

The court made the ruling, which was voted 5-4, in a case where a woman agreed to sexual intercourse using a condom. During one of her sexual intercourse with the man in the case, he removed the condom without her knowledge, and she was forced to take preventive HIV treatment later.

In the case, the accused, Ross McKenzie Kirkpatrick, was charged with sexual assault, but a trial court had quashed the charge on his name and accepted Kirkpatrick's argument that the duo's encounter was with consent, though he removed the condom.

But the British Columbia Court of Appeal overturned the ruling and ordered a new trial.

The court ruled that sexual intercourse without a condom is fundamentally and qualitatively different physical act than sexual intercourse with a condom.

Kirkpatrick's advocate argued that the new interpretation of the criminal code, which is going to be standard throughout the country, will change the rules drastically regarding sexual consent. This would make it almost a binding contract that could be signed in advance, the advocate argued, but the court ruled in the woman's favour.

Show Full Article
TAGS:Supreme CourtCanadasexual assaultconsentSexintercoursecondom
Next Story