Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
Can Trump wield his big stick?
access_time 22 Nov 2024 10:39 AM GMT
election commmission
access_time 22 Nov 2024 4:02 AM GMT
Champions Trophy tournament
access_time 21 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The illness in health care
access_time 20 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The fire in Manipur should be put out
access_time 21 Nov 2024 9:19 AM GMT
America should also be isolated
access_time 18 Nov 2024 11:57 AM GMT
DEEP READ
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Foreign espionage in the UK
access_time 22 Oct 2024 8:38 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightSC stays FIRs against...

SC stays FIRs against 2 women journalists by Tripura Police

text_fields
bookmark_border
SC stays FIRs against 2 women journalists by Tripura Police
cancel
camera_alt

Women journalists Samridhi Sakunia and Swarna Jha 

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday stayed all criminal proceedings over two FIRs lodged by the Tripura police against HW News Network and its two women journalists for their reports on communal violence in the state, NDTV reported.

The three-member bench comprising Justice Chandrachud, Justice Surya Kant and Justice Vikram Nath also sought the Tripura government's response to the plea filed by Samriddhi Sakunia and Swarna Jha to quash the FIRs against them.

The bench also directed the petitioners to file the counter-affidavit within four weeks.

As per reports, the women journalists who came to Tripura to write on the recent communal incidents in the states were detained by Assam police at Karimganj's Neelam Bazar, close to the Assam-Tripura border.

The journalists and the news channel were named in an FIR at Fatikroy Police Station of Tripura based on a complaint filed by a supporter of Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), alleging that they had maligned the image of the Tripura government by their reporting.

The petitioners had challenged the police action by saying that they were only doing ground reporting of facts, based on versions given by the victims of the violence.

"The petition has been filed in relation to the targeted abuse of criminalising the reporting by petitioners and its correspondents/ reporters and illegal detention in relation to, reporting of events regarding violence qua minorities in the State of Tripura in the second half of October," the journalists said in their petition.

The petitioners also called the FIRs "targeted harassment of the press".

The petitioners have argued that the allegations mentioned in the FIRs do not prima facie constitute any offence against the petitioners under Section 153A, 153B, 193,204,120B and 504 of IPC, and the FIRs are liable to be quashed to prevent undue harassment.

"If the State is allowed to criminalize the very act of fact-finding and unbiased reporting then the only facts that will come in the public domain are those that are convenient to the State due to the chilling effect on the freedom of speech and expression of members of civil society," the petition read.

The controversial arrests pertained to tweets alleging a mosque in Tripura had been vandalised during a rally by the Vishwa Hindu Parishad.

The Tripura police had claimed that the video of a mosque burnt in Gomati district and a copy of the Quran damaged, which were uploaded by Sakunia were doctored.

Show Full Article
TAGS:Tripura violencetripura clashWomen journalists
Next Story