Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
Champions Trophy tournament
access_time 21 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The illness in health care
access_time 20 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The fire in Manipur should be put out
access_time 21 Nov 2024 9:19 AM GMT
America should also be isolated
access_time 18 Nov 2024 11:57 AM GMT
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
The betrayal of the highest order
access_time 16 Nov 2024 12:22 PM GMT
DEEP READ
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Foreign espionage in the UK
access_time 22 Oct 2024 8:38 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightKeralachevron_rightPrima facie, malls...

Prima facie, malls don't have right to collect parking fees: Kerala HC

text_fields
bookmark_border
Prima facie, malls dont have right to collect parking fees: Kerala HC
cancel

Kochi: The Kerala High Court on Friday said that malls don't have the right to collect parking fees and asked Kalamassery municipality whether it had issued any license to the Lulu International shopping mall at Ernakulam for the same.

Justice P V Kunhikrishnan, while hearing a plea that the mall was illegally collecting parking fees from customers, however, did not ask the mall to stop the collection but said it would be at their risk.

"As per the Building Rules, sufficient area for parking space is necessary for constructing a building. Parking space is part of the building. The building permit is issued on the condition that there will be parking space. Based on this undertaking the building is constructed. After constructing the building, whether the owner of the building can collect the parking fee is the question. Prima facie I am of the opinion that it is not possible," the court said in its order.

The court has asked the municipality to file a statement about its stand regarding the issue and posted the matter for further hearing on January 28.

"Further collection of the parking fee by the respondent (Lulu Mall) for parking vehicles in the area which is earmarked in the building permit for parking will be subject to the result of the final decision of this writ petition. But I make it clear that they can collect the parking fee at their risk," the court said.

Petitioner Pauly Vadakkan, a film director, has contended that the mall's management was responsible for providing free parking to customers.

Vadakkan moved to the high court after Rs 20 as parking fees was collected from him when he had visited the mall on December 2.

He has alleged that the mall staff closed the exit gates and threatened him when he initially refused to pay the amount.

"The parking area in a commercial complex is a public place meant for the purpose of the customers visiting that commercial complex and the 1st respondent (Lulu) in no way can collect parking fees for the same," it was contended.

However, this contention was opposed by Lulu's lawyer, who said that the mall has a license


Show Full Article
TAGS:Kerala High CourtLulu Mall
Next Story