Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
Can Trump wield his big stick?
access_time 22 Nov 2024 10:39 AM GMT
election commmission
access_time 22 Nov 2024 4:02 AM GMT
Champions Trophy tournament
access_time 21 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The illness in health care
access_time 20 Nov 2024 5:00 AM GMT
The fire in Manipur should be put out
access_time 21 Nov 2024 9:19 AM GMT
America should also be isolated
access_time 18 Nov 2024 11:57 AM GMT
DEEP READ
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 5:18 PM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Foreign espionage in the UK
access_time 22 Oct 2024 8:38 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightSC to hear Subramanian...

SC to hear Subramanian Swamy's petition to remove "Socialism" & "Secularism" from Preamble on Sep 23

text_fields
bookmark_border
SC to hear Subramanian Swamys petition to remove Socialism & Secularism from Preamble on Sep 23
cancel

New Delhi: Rajya Sabha MP Dr Subramanian Swamy filed a writ petition with the Supreme court to have the words"Socialism" and "Secularism" removed from the Preamble to the Constitution, which came up for consideration in the apex court today. Dr Swamy's petition was lodged alongside another one (WP(c) 645/2020) that was listed before the bench of the Chief Justice of India on September 23 by a bench made up of Justices Indira Banerjee and MM Sundresh.

The second petitioner in the case is attorney Satya Sabharwal. The 42nd Constitutional Amendment, passed in 1976 under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, added the words "socialism" and "secularism" to the Preamble. The petition questions the legality of this amendment. It is contended that such an addition is outside the scope of the Parliament's ability to modify the Constitution under Article 368.

The petitioners contend that socialist or secular notions were never meant to be incorporated into democratic administration by the Constitution's drafters. According to reports, Dr B. R. Ambedkar rejected the inclusion of these terms because the Constitution cannot deny citizens their freedom of choice by imposing particular political views on them, Live Law reported.

According to the claim, the Preamble was deemed to be a fundamental component of the Constitution in the Kesavananda Bharati case, and as such, the Parliament is unable to change it. In addition, the petitioners ask that Section 29A(5) of the Representation of Peoples Act 1951 be declared to be unconstitutional since it compels political parties to pledge adherence to socialism and secularism in order to register.

Another court petition (Balram Singh v. Union of India, WP(c) 645/2020) was submitted in July 2020 objecting to the words "socialism" and "secularism" being used in the Preamble.


Show Full Article
TAGS:supreme courtSubramanian SwamyConstitutionPreamble
Next Story