Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
Economic D-Day or D-Day of US-Iran war?
access_time 22 Aug 2026 9:46 AM IST
Do not forget this martyr
access_time 22 Aug 2026 9:30 AM IST
Obfuscating caste count behind census
access_time 20 Aug 2026 9:30 AM IST
Memories of a centenarian freedom fighter
access_time 19 Aug 2026 2:40 PM IST
NEET Protest 2026
access_time 19 Aug 2026 12:02 PM IST
DEEP READ
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 11:16 AM IST
Horrible shame!
access_time 21 July 2026 3:27 PM IST
Is Cuba going to succumb to US sanctions?
access_time 24 April 2026 3:08 PM IST
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightRelief for Patanjali,...

Relief for Patanjali, SC declines to entertain plea against Madras HC order

text_fields
bookmark_border
Relief for Patanjali, SC declines to entertain plea against Madras HC order
cancel
camera_alt

Supreme Court of India, Image courtesy: https://www.india.com

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday declined to entertain a plea by Chennai-based firm assailing a Madras High Court order that stayed a Rs 10 lakh penalty on Patanjali Ayurved and restrained it from using the trademark Coronil.

A bench comprising Chief Justice S.A. Bobde and Justices A.S. Bopanna and V. Ramasubramanian allowed the petitioner to withdraw the plea.

The top court also allowed the petitioner to pursue the matter in the Madras High Court, as it was informed that this matter was slated for hearing on September 3. The high court passed the order on an appeal filed by Patanjali and Divya Yog Mandir Trust.

The petitioner has claimed that Coronil is its trademark product owned by it since 1993 and the product with this name is an acid inhibitor used to clean heavy machinery and chemical preparations for industrial use.

A single judge had slapped the penalty for promoting Coronil as a cure for Covid-19 viral infection, but this was stayed by the division bench of the Madras High Court.

Chennai based Arudra Engineers Private Limited, had moved the court against Patanjali. The company claimed it received the trademark for Coronil-213SPL and Coronil-92B, and it has this trademark for the name till 2027. The High Court had issued interim stay on the single judge order.

On August 6, the single judge bench restrained Patanjali from using the trademark Coronil.

Show Full Article
TAGS:#Supreme Court#Covid19#Patanjali#Madras High Court
Next Story