Film: 'Newton'; Director: Amit R Masurkar; Starring: Rajkummar Rao, Anjali Patil, Pankaj Tripathi; Rating: ****
In Hrishikesh Mukherjee's "Satyakam", a film that echoes in unexpected ways in the new Rajkummar Rao experience, when Dharmendra the obstinate idealist, is asked why he stood second in his exams he replies: "Because the student who stood first was better than me."
Newton Kumar exactly that idealist from Hrishikesh Mukherjee's film grappling with the political irony of a country where a majority is too poor and illiterate to vote. Rajkummar's "Newton" is the guy who will shine if not outshine the competition by the strength of his convictions.
This is one more triumphant performance for Rao who has made a habit of conferring a brilliant narrative to every character he plays. Really, it's become a force of habit for this actor.
On the contrary our diminutive hero often seems ridiculous in his stubborn adherence to guidelines and rules. There is a sequence at the very end where Newton's friend a level-headed quietly intlligent Adivasi girl (Anjali Patil) drops in at his office and suggests they go out for tea. But Newton won't leave for another 5 minutes until his official lunch break starts. As time ticks by we see the couple waiting, while we, sadly, must bid them adieu.
This is the kind of cinema where the characters must never entertain us by acting larger-than-life. The setting is a Lok Sabha election constituency in the heartland of Chattisgarh where Maoist violence has rendered the electorate redundant.Who was to know that a spirited idealistic election clerk would suddenly break through the inertia of non-performance in the jungles of Chattigarh.
Pankaj Tripathy as the local government official impatient to get the election over it and Anjali Patil as a local girl who accompanies Newton(so named by self because he didn't like his original name Nutan) to the interiors of the inaccessible jungles for a day in the electoral battle, imbue their habitual brilliance to the plot.
The narrative is in no hurry to draw up a convincing case for Newton's rigid idealism. He is what he is, and we accept his idiosyncrasies in the hope that he will eventually surprise us.And he does.
As "Newton" and his bored colleagues proceed into places where voting is unthinkable, we are given a sense of the democratic process having to a go long way before the Newton Kumars at the bottom of the bureaucratic ladder can see the dawn of a new era.But then if we want to make a difference we can't remain indifferent.
"Newton" shakes us up in ways that are not visible to the naked eye.