Screengrab from Media One footage.

BJP’s ‘cash-for-vote’ in Kerala polls: North Indian-style money-power politics?

Kerala: A political storm had detonated in Kerala’s Palakkad, after shocking visuals and allegations torn open what appears to be a brazen operation to buy votes in broad daylight by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which seems to be resorting to means to any extent to build inroads into the state. The controversy centred around the saffron party candidate Sobha Surendran, who slipped into the heart of a scandal.

The video at the centre of the uproar captured scenes that opponents claim are undeniable: money being handed directly to voters, along with goods like sarees and liquor. According to reports, the distribution allegedly took place in vulnerable, economically weaker localities—raising serious questions about targeting poor communities for electoral manipulation.

What makes the purported visuals explosive is not just the alleged act itself, but the boldness. If the videos are showing truth, it is not whispered corruption hidden in backrooms. It is, as critics allege, open, organised, and systematic vote-buying unfolding in public view.

But the scandal doesn’t stop at alleged bribery.

As cameras rolled, the situation reportedly turned aggressive. When locals and opposition workers began recording the distribution, threats erupted on the spot. Sobha Surendran could be seen in the video threatening to smash the heads and phones of those filming, creating a chilling atmosphere of fear and confrontation.

Eyewitness accounts claim attempts were even made to snatch phones and destroy evidence, turning what began as an alleged electoral malpractice into a scene of intimidation and near-violence.

Leaders from both the Communist Party of India (Marxist) and the Indian National Congress have lashed out, branding the incident as a dangerous import of North Indian style money power politics into Kerala.

They allege that what is unfolding is not an isolated incident, but part of a wider strategy to flood elections with cash and influence outcomes through coercion and inducement.

What has stunned observers is the claim that the candidate herself was directly involved in distributing cash, something rarely caught so explicitly on camera.

Tags: