In a rebuke against arbitrary demolitions by state authorities, the Supreme Court of India on Monday expressed grave concerns over the practice of using bulldozers to punish individuals merely accused of crimes.
A bench comprising Justices BR Gavai and KV Viswanathan sharply criticized the Uttar Pradesh government’s approach, labelling it as "bulldozer justice" and emphasising the need for standardised national guidelines.
The case arose from petitions challenging a series of demolitions carried out by the North Delhi Municipal Corporation in Jahangirpuri, Delhi, in 2022. These demolitions, initially aimed at unauthorized constructions, sparked communal tensions and were subsequently halted. Former Rajya Sabha MP Brinda Karat has been vocal in challenging these actions, arguing that they violate fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution.
Senior Advocate Dushyant Dave, representing petitioners, argued before the bench, asserting that demolitions infringe upon the right to life guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. He urged the Court not only to halt such actions but also to mandate the reconstruction of demolished homes as a restorative measure.
Justice Gavai questioned the rationale behind demolishing homes based solely on accusations, stating unequivocally, "It can't be demolished even if he's convicted."
The bench called for draft suggestions from all parties involved, signalling to establish comprehensive guidelines to ensure that demolitions, even for unauthorized constructions, are conducted strictly within the bounds of the law.
The Court adjourned the matter until September 17.