Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
Whose failure is it when the system fails?
access_time 1 July 2025 9:44 AM IST
Citizenship rights, human rights
access_time 30 Jun 2025 9:30 AM IST
Iran in the new (West Asian) world order
access_time 28 Jun 2025 9:30 AM IST
Raj Bhavan; not an RSS office
access_time 27 Jun 2025 9:30 AM IST
axiom 4
access_time 26 Jun 2025 10:15 AM IST
DEEP READ
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 11:16 AM IST
Espionage in the UK
access_time 13 Jun 2025 10:20 PM IST
Yet another air tragedy
access_time 13 Jun 2025 9:45 AM IST
The Russian plan: Invade Japan and South Korea
access_time 16 Jan 2025 3:32 PM IST
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightWorldchevron_rightIMF yet to decide...

IMF yet to decide retention of chief Kristalina Georgieva: Report

text_fields
bookmark_border
IMF yet to decide retention of chief Kristalina Georgieva: Report
cancel
camera_alt

Image Credit: AFP (2018)

The International Monetary Fund has revealed on Sunday that it still has not come to any decision as to whether head Kristalina Georgieva will keep her job after allegations that she pressured the World Bank to give China a favourable rating in a report.

On Saturday the IMF board met again with representatives of the firm, WilmerHale, and with Georgieva over the weekend "with a view to very soon concluding its consideration of the matter," the IMF said in a statement.

Investigating law firm Wilmer Hale had published its findings in September which concluded that Georgieva had put "undue pressure" on World Bank staff to adjust the rating in the "Doing Business" report when she served as the chief executive officer. The report which measures ease and transparency of doing business in a particular economy has now been discontinued by the World Bank as its methodology has come under fire for its lack of objectivity.

Georgieva has denied all allegations even as the IMF struggles to keep its image afloat after a series of scandals. The US is also looking into the alleged manipulation, asserting that the matter is 'very serious'.

The investigation was precipitated by the remarks of Paul Romer, a Nobel prize winner and chief economist at the World Bank who said in an interview that Chinese pressure was a factor in staff altering draft reports. Romer's criticism of the "Doing Business" report in an interview with the Wall Street Journal raised many suspicions. He quit working at the World Bank after a falling out with Georgieva.

Show Full Article
TAGS:China#world bankIMFControversyBusiness
Next Story