Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
Citizenship rights, human rights
access_time 30 Jun 2025 9:30 AM IST
Iran in the new (West Asian) world order
access_time 28 Jun 2025 9:30 AM IST
Raj Bhavan; not an RSS office
access_time 27 Jun 2025 9:30 AM IST
axiom 4
access_time 26 Jun 2025 10:15 AM IST
When AI 171 crash made me feel the pain
access_time 25 Jun 2025 11:34 AM IST
DEEP READ
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 11:16 AM IST
Espionage in the UK
access_time 13 Jun 2025 10:20 PM IST
Yet another air tragedy
access_time 13 Jun 2025 9:45 AM IST
The Russian plan: Invade Japan and South Korea
access_time 16 Jan 2025 3:32 PM IST
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightKeralachevron_rightHC quashes Vigilance...

HC quashes Vigilance court proceedings against Chandy, Aryadan

text_fields
bookmark_border
HC quashes Vigilance court proceedings against Chandy, Aryadan
cancel

Kochi: In a relief to former Chief Minister Oommen Chandy and former Power Minister Aryadan Mohammed, the High Court Friday quashed proceedings initiated by the Vigilance Court in Thrissur against them in connection with bribery charge in the solar scam.

Justice B Kemal Pasha, allowing a petition by Chandy and Mohammed, said the vigilance court had acted in a haste and the complaint does not disclose anything even for a quick verification.

On January 28, Inquiry Commissioner and Special Judge Thrissur S S Vassan had directed Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau Director to register an FIR on a private complaint by a social worker on bribery charges against Chandy and Mohammed levelled by solar scam prime accused Saritha S Nair before a judicial commission probing the matter.

The high court in an interim order on the very next day suspended the Vigilance court order, observing that it had acted mechanically without knowing the nature and extent of its powers.

Saritha, while deposing before the Justice G Sivarajan Commission, had alleged that she had paid bribes to the tune of Rs 1.90 crore to a close aide of Chandy and Rs 40 lakh to Mohammed.

Setting aside the FIR and further proceddings, Justice Pasha said the complaint in the vigilanec court was not worth to be accepted by a court of law.

The Judge said necessity of quick verification comes up only when a complaint reveals some probable allegation of corruption and hearsay cannot be treated as a material for investigation.

Mere 'revelation' by Saritha before the commission cannot be said to be a matter to be acted upon in any manner when she has not stood for cross-examination fully, he said.

Justice Pasha also said since the matter narrated by the petitioner was within the knowledge of Saritha, by any stretch of imagination, the complainant cannot be permitted to assume role of Saritha.

Show Full Article
Next Story