Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
The era of hit and run is over!
access_time 3 July 2025 2:18 PM IST
Supreme Courts laudable reservation decision
access_time 3 July 2025 12:47 PM IST
You too, Tharoor!
access_time 2 July 2025 12:11 PM IST
Whose failure is it when the system fails?
access_time 1 July 2025 9:44 AM IST
Citizenship rights, human rights
access_time 30 Jun 2025 9:30 AM IST
DEEP READ
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 11:16 AM IST
Espionage in the UK
access_time 13 Jun 2025 10:20 PM IST
Yet another air tragedy
access_time 13 Jun 2025 9:45 AM IST
The Russian plan: Invade Japan and South Korea
access_time 16 Jan 2025 3:32 PM IST
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightKeralachevron_rightGST bill: Thomas Isaac...

GST bill: Thomas Isaac writes to Centre

text_fields
bookmark_border
GST bill: Thomas Isaac writes to Centre
cancel

Thiruvananthapuram: Kerala and West Bengal have raised opposition against the Constitution Amendment Bill for GST saying the amendments included in the bill were against the assurances given in the meeting of the Empowered Committee of the state Finance Ministers.

Kerala’s finance minister TM Thomas Isaac, in a letter to Jaitley, raised the issue pertaining to an amendment made by the Union Cabinet last week on Article 270, which allegedly deprives states from the divisible pool of Integrated GST revenue on unclaimed credits in B2C (business-to-customer) and B2G (business-to-government) transactions.

Isaac in his letter also reiterated the consensus of Empowered Committee in its last meeting regarding “full” compensation for states for five years.

He said that the amendment in Article 270 is against the decision of the Empowered Committee of 2014 where it was decided that the residual amount in the IGST account shall be shared with the states as per the Finance Commission formula.

Separately, the Empowered Committee of State Finance Ministers’ chairman and West Bengal finance minister Amit Mitra also raised a red flag over the government’s decision to stop short of explicitly providing for “full” compensation to states in the Bill.

Show Full Article
Next Story