Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
Peoples priority is livelihood issues
access_time 12 April 2024 4:30 AM GMT
The survival challenge before the CPM
access_time 10 April 2024 5:05 AM GMT
NATO
access_time 9 April 2024 4:00 AM GMT
Genocide failing in its goal
access_time 8 April 2024 4:13 AM GMT
DEEP READ
Schools breeding hatred
access_time 14 Sep 2023 10:37 AM GMT
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 5:46 AM GMT
Ramadan: Its essence and lessons
access_time 13 March 2024 9:24 AM GMT
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightPetition filed in SC...

Petition filed in SC challenging the constitutional validity of sedition law

text_fields
bookmark_border
Petition filed in SC challenging the constitutional validity of sedition law
cancel

Advocates Aditya Ranjan, Varun Thakur and V Elenchezhiyan filed a plea before the Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 124-A, or the sedition law, reports Livelaw. The petition was filed through Advocate Sanjay Kumar Pathak.

Instigated by the section's misuse, the plea emphasized on the colonial origin and nature of the law introduced by the British. Such a Section, which lacks procedural safeguards and fails to lay down responsibility on the police in case of misuse, has no place in a constitutional democracy, asserts the plea.

The petition further added that the law stifled freedom of speech and expression and threatened citizens' life and liberty if they dissent government propositions. The Right to question, criticize and change the public representatives and the Government is fundamental to democracy, noted the petitioners.

The petition also demanded instructions to the Government to be conveyed to heads of police and DGPs to ensure that the law is practised as described by the Supreme Court in the Kedar Nath case and Balwant Singh Case. In the two cases, the SC had limited the section's cover to include written or spoken words that implicitly subvert the Government by violent means alone. The SC also called for greater sensitivity and refrain from the police and demanded that speech be considered as "a whole in a free, fair and liberal spirit."

Show Full Article
TAGS:UAPASeditionrepeal of laws
Next Story