Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
proflie-avatar
Login
exit_to_app
RSS chiefs ‘True Independence Day
access_time 15 Jan 2025 3:35 PM IST
The firestorm in America
access_time 14 Jan 2025 10:36 AM IST
Dont let this daughter be defeated, too
access_time 13 Jan 2025 9:30 AM IST
The India-Taliban talks
access_time 11 Jan 2025 9:20 AM IST
Who will give back their lost years?
access_time 10 Jan 2025 11:01 AM IST
DEEP READ
Munambam Waqf issue decoded
access_time 16 Nov 2024 10:48 PM IST
Ukraine
access_time 16 Aug 2023 11:16 AM IST
Putin
access_time 2 Jan 2025 1:36 PM IST
What is Christmas?
access_time 26 Dec 2024 11:19 AM IST
exit_to_app
Homechevron_rightIndiachevron_rightMinister’s speech can...

Minister’s speech can vicariously be attributed to Govt: Justice Nagarathna’s dissension

text_fields
bookmark_border
Minister’s speech can vicariously be attributed to Govt: Justice Nagarathna’s dissension
cancel

New Delhi: Making dissension in the five-judge Constitutional bench judgment over the freedom of speech of public functionaries, Justice BV Nagarathna termed hate speech as a strike at the foundational values of the Constitution, besides observing that such speech, if it is done by a minister, can vicariously be attributed to the government.

A Constitution bench of Justices SA Nazeer, BR Gavai, AS Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian, in a separate judgement, ruled that a minister's statement cannot be attributed "vicariously" to the government.

Writing a judgement expressing dissent on this issue, Justice Nagarathna said indiscreet speech is a cause of concern in recent times as it is hurtful and insulting.

"Hate speech strikes at the foundation values of the constitution by marking society as unequal. It also violates the fraternity of citizens from diverse backgrounds. The sine qua non (essential condition) of a cohesive society is based on plurality and multi-culturalism such as in India which is 'Bharat'. Fraternity is based on the idea that citizens have reciprocal responsibilities towards one another," she said.

Public functionaries and other persons of influence including celebrities are duty-bound to be more responsible and restrained in their speech, Justice Nagarathna said.

"They are required to understand and measure their words having regard to the likely consequences on public sentiment and behaviour and also be aware of the example they are setting on the fellow citizens to follow," she said.

Justice Nagarathna said it is for the party to control the speeches made by their ministers which can be done by forming a code of conduct.

"Any citizen who feels attacked by such speeches made or hate speech by public functionary etc can approach a court for civil remedies. It is for parliament in its wisdom to enact a law to restrain public functionary from making disparaging remarks against fellow citizens bearing in mind Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(2)," she said.

The top court judge said for a country like ours which is a parliamentary democracy, freedom of speech and expression is a necessary right for ensuring a healthy democracy.

The court was hearing a plea filed by a man whose wife and daughter were allegedly gang-raped in July 2016 on a highway near Bulandshahr. He was seeking transfer of the case to Delhi and lodging of an FIR against then Uttar Pradesh minister Azam Khan for his controversial statement that the gang-rape case was a "political conspiracy".

The judgement came over the question of whether restrictions can be imposed on a public functionary's right to freedom of speech and expression.

Source: PTI

Show Full Article
TAGS:Select A Tag
Next Story